Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 26;61(39):e202208851.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202208851. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Spontaneous Decomposition of an Extraordinarily Twisted and Trans-Bent Fully-Phosphanyl-Substituted Digermene to an Unusual GeI Cluster

Affiliations

Spontaneous Decomposition of an Extraordinarily Twisted and Trans-Bent Fully-Phosphanyl-Substituted Digermene to an Unusual GeI Cluster

Keith Izod et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Ditetrelenes R2 E=ER2 (E=Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) substituted by multiple N/P/O/S-donor groups are extremely rare due to their propensity to disaggregate into their tetrylene monomers R2 E. We report the synthesis of the first fully phosphanyl-substituted digermene {(Mes)2 P}2 Ge=Ge{P(Mes)2 }2 (3, Mes=2,4,6-Me3 C6 H2 ), which adopts a highly unusual structure in the solid state, that is both strongly trans-bent and highly twisted. Variable-temperature 31 P{1 H} NMR spectroscopy suggests that 3 persists in solution, but is subject to a dynamic equilibrium between two conformations, which have different geometries about the Ge=Ge bond (twisted/non-twisted) due to a difference in the nature of their π-stacking interactions. Compound 3 undergoes unprecedented, spontaneous decomposition in solution to give a unique GeI cluster {(Mes)2 P}4 Ge4 ⋅5 CyMe (7).

Keywords: Cluster; Germanium; Multiple Bond; Phosphorus; Solid-State Structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical conformations of ditetrelenes (E=Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) and definition of trans‐bending and twist angles in trans‐bent ditetrelenes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selected examples of disilenes and digermenes bearing multiple heteroatom substituents (other than Si).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structures of diphosphatetrylenes (R2P)2E.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Molecular structure of one of the two independent molecules of 3 viewed a) perpendicular to, and b) along the Ge−Ge axis; H atoms and solvent of crystallization omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] [values for the second independent molecule in the asymmetric unit in square brackets]: Ge(1)‐Ge(2) 2.4476(9) [Ge(3)‐Ge(4) 2.4701(9)], Ge(1)‐P(1) 2.3318(16) [Ge(3)‐P(5) 2.3371(18)], Ge(1)‐P(2) 2.3176(16) [Ge(3)‐P(6) 2.3540(17)], Ge(2)‐P(3) 2.3483(15) [Ge(4)‐P(7) 2.3619(18)], Ge(2)‐P(4) 2.3753(16) [Ge(4)‐P(8) 2.3428(15)], P(1)‐Ge(1)‐P(2) 104.54(5) [P(5)‐Ge(3)‐P(6) 98.35(6)], P(3)‐Ge(2)‐P(4) 95.58(5) [P(7)‐Ge(4)‐P(8) 96.78(4)].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Newman projections illustrating the different conformations of the E2P4 cores of 2 and 3.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The twisted, but non‐trans‐bent digermene 4 viewed perpendicular to (left) and along (right) the Ge−Ge direction.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Illustration of the different π‐stacking modes in 2 and 3 (Ar=Mes).
Figure 8
Figure 8
HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of 3.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Variable‐temperature 31P{1H} NMR spectra of 3 in d 8‐toluene [*(Mes)2P−P(Mes)2 (6), # signals due to decomposition product 7 (see below)].
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Possible dynamic equilibria for 3 in solution (Ar=Mes).
Figure 10
Figure 10
31P{1H} NMR spectra of a solution of 3 in toluene recorded at 20 h intervals.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Molecular structure of 7 with 40 % probability ellipsoids and with H atoms and disordered solvent of crystallization omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths [Å]: Ge(1)⋅⋅⋅Ge(2) 2.9267(3), Ge(1)‐Ge(3) 2.5622(4), Ge(1)‐Ge(4) 2.5802(3), Ge(2)‐Ge(3) 2.5656(3), Ge(2)‐Ge(4) 2.5749(4), Ge(3)⋅⋅⋅Ge(4) 3.5767(1) Ge(1)‐P(1) 2.3617(6), Ge(1)‐P(4) 2.3982(6), Ge(2)‐P(2) 2.3534(6), Ge(2)‐P(4) 2.4088(6), Ge(3)‐P(3) 2.4816(6), Ge(4)‐P(3) 2.4662(6).
Figure 12
Figure 12
Comparison of the cores of 7 and 8.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Proposed decomposition of 3 into 7 (free energy changes in square brackets are given in kJ mol−1 [(u)B97D/6‐311G(2d,p)]).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Polymorphism in a secondary phosphine.
    Liu M, Izod K, Waddell PG. Liu M, et al. Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem. 2025 Feb 1;81(Pt 2):109-113. doi: 10.1107/S2053229625000555. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem. 2025. PMID: 39907072 Free PMC article.

References

    1. None
    1. Lenoir D., Smith P. J., Liebman J. F., Nicolaides A., Johnson R. P., Konrad K. M., Strained Hydrocarbons (Ed.: Dodziuk H.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009;
    1. Wiberg K. B., Reactive Intermediate Chemistry (Eds.: Moss R. A., Platz M. S., Jones, Jr. M.), Wiley, Hoboken, 2004, pp. 717–740;
    1. Takezawa H., Murase T., Fujita M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17420–17423; - PubMed
    1. ter Wiel M. K. J., Kwit M. G., Meetsma A., Feringa B. L., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 87–96. - PubMed