Can the 1-Leg Standing Test Be Replaced by Self-reported Balance in the First-Time Injurious Fall Screening Tool?
- PMID: 35947043
- PMCID: PMC10032368
- DOI: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000362
Can the 1-Leg Standing Test Be Replaced by Self-reported Balance in the First-Time Injurious Fall Screening Tool?
Abstract
Background and purpose: The First-time Injurious Fall (FIF) screening tool was created to identify fall risk in community-living older men and women, who may be targets for primary preventive interventions. The FIF tool consists of 3 self-reported questions and 1 physical test (1-leg standing balance). The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive ability of the FIF tool and a modified FIF tool (in which 1-leg standing is replaced by self-reported balance) for first-time injurious falls.
Methods: A cohort of 1194 community-living people 60 years and older from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), Sweden, was followed longitudinally for 5 years. Data on injurious falls were collected from registered data and were defined as receipt of care after a fall. The predictive ability of the FIF tool and the m-FIF tool was explored using Harrell's C statistic, stratified by sex.
Results and discussion: The injurious fall rate per 1000 person-years was 54.9 (95% CI: 47.22-63.78) for women and 36.3 (95% CI: 28.84-45.78) for men. The predictive ability for women and men according to Harrell's C statistic was 0.70 and 0.71 for the FIF tool and the m-FIF tool. The predictive ability was 0.70 and 0.69 for 1-leg standing, and 0.65 and 0.60 for self-reported balance problems.
Conclusions: The m-FIF tool presented similar predictive ability as the FIF tool regarding first-time injurious falls. This finding could extend the usefulness of the tool to other settings, such as to electronic health (eHealth). A quickly and easily administered screening tool can help physical therapists to identify people with a high risk of falling who may need to undergo a more comprehensive fall risk assessment.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy, APTA.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Kannus P, Sievanen H, Palvanen M, Järvinen T, Parkkari J. Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people. Lancet (London, England). 2005;366(9500):1885–1893. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67604-0 - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age. Accessed December 10, 2020. http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Falls_prevention7March.pdf
-
- Ganz DA, Bao Y, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LZ. Will my patient fall? JAMA. 2007;297(1):77–86. doi:10.1001/jama.297.1.77 - PubMed
-
- Kenny R, Rubenstein LZ, Tinetti M, et al. Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(1):148–157. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x - PubMed
-
- Mello Porto J, Rodrigues Losimuta N, Freire Junior R, et al. Risk factors for future falls among community-dwelling older adults without a fall in the previous year: a prospective one-year longitudinal study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;23(91):104161. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2020.104161 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
