Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;68(4):1551-1558.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07655-w. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade Stent Placement in Patients with Failed ERCP as a Modality of Preoperative and Palliative Biliary Drainage

Affiliations

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade Stent Placement in Patients with Failed ERCP as a Modality of Preoperative and Palliative Biliary Drainage

Sridhar Sundaram et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: No large studies have addressed the role of endoscopic-ultrasound biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction (MEBO). We aimed to discuss the outcomes of EUS antegrade stent placement (EUS-AG) in the preoperative and palliative setting.

Methods: Retrospective review of patients who underwent EUS-AG for MEBO between December 2019 and December 2021 was done. Primary outcome measures were technical success and clinical success. Secondary outcome measures were number of days of hospitalization postprocedure, adverse events related to EUS-AG procedure, morbidity related to surgery, and 3-month mortality after surgery.

Results: 54 patients underwent attempt for EUS-AG (mean age 54.8 ± 12.1 years; female 44.4%). Most common primary cancer was pancreatic cancer in 42.1% (23/54) patients. Indication was palliative in 34 (62.9%) patients and PBD in 20 (37%) patients. Level of block was distal in 35 (64.8%) and proximal in 19 (35.1%) patients. Technical success of EUS-AG was 88.7% (47/53). Clinical success was seen in 95.7% (45/47) patients. Median number of days of hospitalization postprocedure was 1 day. No procedure-related severe adverse events were seen. Of 20 patients who underwent EUS-AG as PBD, 19 had technical success (95%) with clinical success in 94.5% (18/19). Surgery was performed in 11 patients, of whom 10 patients underwent successful PPPD (one intraoperative liver metastasis). Two patients had Clavein-Dindo III/IV complication post-PPPD, with one mortality within 30 days of surgery.

Conclusion: EUS-AG is safe and effective after failed ERCP in both preoperative and palliative setting.

Keywords: EUS antegrade stent placement; EUS biliary drainage; Outcomes; Preoperative biliary drainage; Stents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim DC, Moon JH, Choi HJ. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at an academic medical center in the era of less-invasive diagnostic tools. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;6:549–551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Born P, Rosch T, Triptrap A et al. Long-term results of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for benign and malignant bile duct strictures. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998;33:544–549. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim JH. Endoscopic stent placement in the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Clin Endosc. 2011;44:76–86. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2011.44.2.76 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Scheufele F, Schorn S, Demir IE et al. Preoperative biliary stenting versus operation first in jaundiced patients due to malignant lesions in the pancreatic head: A meta-analysis of current literature. Surgery. 2017;161:939–950. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaib Y, Rahal MA, Rammal MO, Mailhac A, Tamim H. Preoperative biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: results from a national database. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24:637–642. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources