Re-evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early onset scoliosis: a 10-year update
- PMID: 35947359
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00561-1
Re-evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early onset scoliosis: a 10-year update
Erratum in
-
Correction: Re-evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early onset scoliosis: a 10-year update.Spine Deform. 2023 Jan;11(1):263. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00596-4. Spine Deform. 2023. PMID: 36171501 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: Consensus and uncertainty in early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment were evaluated in 2010. It is currently unknown how treatment preferences have evolved over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for EOS patients to understand how they compare to 10 years ago.
Methods: 11 pediatric spinal surgeons (similar participants as in 2010) were invited to complete a survey of 315 idiopathic and neuromuscular EOS cases (same cases as in 2010). Treatment options included the following: conservative management, distraction-based methods, growth guidance/modulation, and arthrodesis. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement, and uncertainty was < 70%. Associations between case characteristics and consensus for treatments were assessed via chi-squared and multiple regression analyses. Case characteristics associated with uncertainty were described.
Results: Eleven surgeons [31.7 ± 7.8 years of experience] in the original 2010 cohort completed the survey. Consensus for conservative management was found in idiopathic patients aged ≤ 3, whereas in 2010, some of these cases were selected for surgery. There is currently consensus for casting idiopathic patients aged 1 or 2 with moderate curves, whereas in 2010, there was uncertainty between casting and bracing. Among neuromuscular cases with consensus for surgery, arthrodesis was chosen for patients aged 9 with larger curves.
Conclusion: Presently, preferences for conservative management have increased in comparison to 2010, and casting appears to be preferred over bracing in select infantile cases. Future research efforts with higher levels-of-evidence should be devoted to elucidate the areas of uncertainty to improve care in the EOS population.
Level of evidence: Level V.
Keywords: 10 years; Consensus; Early onset scoliosis; Treatment options; Uncertainty.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
References
-
- Fernandes P, Weinstein SL (2007) Natural history of early onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(Suppl 1):21–33. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00754 - DOI
-
- Corona J, Miller DJ, Downs J et al (2013) Evaluating the extent of clinical uncertainty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e67 - DOI
-
- Vitale MG, Gomez JA, Matsumoto H et al (2011) Variability of expert opinion in treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1317–1322 - DOI
-
- Alderson P (1996) Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy. J Med Ethics 22:135–139 - DOI
-
- Fries JF, Krishnan E (2004) Equipoise, design bias, and randomized controlled trials: the elusive ethics of new drug development. Arthritis Res Ther 6:R250–R255. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar1170 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous