Can We Realize Our Collaborative Potential? A Critical Review of Faculty Roles and Experiences in Interprofessional Education
- PMID: 35947466
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004909
Can We Realize Our Collaborative Potential? A Critical Review of Faculty Roles and Experiences in Interprofessional Education
Abstract
Purpose: Faculty within interprofessional education (IPE) are essential contributors to IPE implementation efforts. Although the majority of existing IPE literature consists of reports on IPE innovations, few insights are available into the experiences of the faculty members who deliver IPE. This critical narrative review was designed to synthesize the knowledge available about (1) roles assigned to IPE educators and (2) IPE faculty members' experiences of fulfilling these roles.
Method: Six databases for English-language studies published between 2000 and March 2021 were searched: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and MedEdPortal. A total of 1,717 manuscripts were identified for possible inclusion. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 214 articles constituted the final literature corpus. Harden and Crosby's original framework of 6 roles of medical educators augmented with the manager role introduced in Harden and Lilley's 2018 framework informed the analysis.
Results: IPE faculty take on all 6 roles identified by Harden and Crosby: facilitator, planner, information provider, examiner, role model, and resource developer, as well as the manager role. Faculty were most commonly identified as facilitator and planner, and rarely as role models. The authors identified 3 main struggles experienced by IPE faculty: personal (e.g., confidence as a cross-professions educator), interpersonal (e.g., co-teaching IPE), and institutional (e.g., supporting IPE logistics).
Conclusions: This review highlights the complexity of the roles taken on by IPE faculty and the struggles they experience in the process. The results suggest that attention to the different roles that IPE faculty play in educational interventions and to equipping faculty with the necessary competencies, tools, and support, is fundamental to the success of IPE. Future research should harness the explanatory power of theories to help explain dynamics at play between personal, interpersonal, and institutional barriers to identify interventions that can aid IPE faculty in delivering collaboration-ready professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Similar articles
-
Mapping the interprofessional education landscape for students on rural clinical placements: an integrative literature review.Rural Remote Health. 2018 May;18(2):4336. doi: 10.22605/RRH4336. Epub 2018 May 4. Rural Remote Health. 2018. PMID: 29724107 Review.
-
Interprofessional education and collaborative practice in Kuwait: attitudes and barriers from faculty.J Interprof Care. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):208-216. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1713062. Epub 2020 Feb 16. J Interprof Care. 2021. PMID: 32064974
-
Faculty development to support interprofessional education in healthcare professions: A realist synthesis.J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):695-701. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1209466. Epub 2016 Jul 26. J Interprof Care. 2016. PMID: 27459591
-
The effectiveness of faculty development activities for interprofessional education : A systematic review protocol.J Interprof Care. 2022 Jul-Aug;36(4):630-633. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1929105. Epub 2021 Jun 18. J Interprof Care. 2022. PMID: 34139946
-
Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03073-0. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 34980083 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Qualitative study on the perceived enablers and barriers to interprofessional education in primary care in Singapore.BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 5;26(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02769-2. BMC Prim Care. 2025. PMID: 40325367 Free PMC article.
-
Preaching Through the Choir. What Interprofessional Education Can Learn From Choir Singing.Perspect Med Educ. 2024 May 2;13(1):274-279. doi: 10.5334/pme.1182. eCollection 2024. Perspect Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38706453 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Perceptions and Practices of Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Education in Palliative Care Settings.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Apr 6;15:281-291. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S450166. eCollection 2024. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024. PMID: 38600963 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME guide no. 9. Med Teach. 2007;29:735–751.
-
- Paradis E, Whitehead CR. Beyond the lamppost: A proposal for a fourth wave of education for collaboration. Acad Med. 2018;93:1457.
-
- Rawlinson C, Carron T, Cohidon C, et al. An overview of reviews on interprofessional collaboration in primary care: Barriers and facilitators. Int J Integr Care. 2021;21:32.
-
- Seaton J, Jones A, Johnston C, Francis K. Allied health professionals’ perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: An integrative review. J Interprof Care. 2021;35:217–228.
-
- Doekhie KD, Buljac-Samardzic M, Strating MMH, Paauwe J. Who is on the primary care team? Professionals’ perceptions of the conceptualization of teams and the underlying factors: A mixed-methods study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:111.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources