Positivity and Risk Factors for Trichomonas vaginalis Among Women Attending a Sexual Health Clinic in Melbourne, 2006 to 2019
- PMID: 35948300
- PMCID: PMC9553257
- DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001690
Positivity and Risk Factors for Trichomonas vaginalis Among Women Attending a Sexual Health Clinic in Melbourne, 2006 to 2019
Abstract
Background: Trichomonas vaginalis is not a notifiable disease in Australia in most states, resulting in limited Australian epidemiological studies. This study aimed to examine the positivity of T. vaginalis in women attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) and identify associated factors.
Methods: All women 16 years or older who were tested for T. vaginalis at MSHC from 2006 to 2019 were included. The diagnostic method changed from culture to nucleic acid amplification test in August 2018. The annual positivity of T. vaginalis was calculated. Because of the data completeness, we performed a generalized estimating equations multivariable logistic regression using data from 2011 to 2019 to examine factors associated with T. vaginalis positivity.
Results: From 2006 to 2019, 69,739 tests for T. vaginalis were conducted, and 294 tested positive (0.42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37%-0.47%). Approximately 60% of women tested reported symptoms. After adjusting for potential confounders including the change in diagnostic method, there was a 21% (95% CI, 12%-31%) annual increase in T. vaginalis positivity between 2011 and 2019. Women with concurrent syphilis had the highest odds of testing positive for T. vaginalis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 21.55; 95% CI, 6.96-66.78), followed by women who had injected drugs in the last 12 months (aOR, 6.99; 95% CI, 4.11-11.87), were 35 years or older (aOR, 3.47; 95% CI, 2.26-5.35), or had concurrent chlamydia (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.05-2.99).
Conclusions: The rising positivity of T. vaginalis at MSHC irrespective of change in diagnostic method suggests a concurrent community-wide rise in Melbourne. Given the rising positivity, testing informed by risk factors should be considered.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. E.P.F.C. is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172873). C.K.F. and C.S.B. are each supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172900 and GNT1173361, respectively).
Figures

References
-
- Carey JC, Yaffe SJ, Catz C. The vaginal infections and prematurity study: An overview. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 36:809–820. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources