Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;37(4):575-585.
doi: 10.1177/02692163221115331. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

The association between socioeconomic position and the symptoms and concerns of hospital inpatients seen by specialist palliative care: Analysis of routinely collected patient data

Affiliations

The association between socioeconomic position and the symptoms and concerns of hospital inpatients seen by specialist palliative care: Analysis of routinely collected patient data

Joanna M Davies et al. Palliat Med. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Understanding how socioeconomic position influences the symptoms and concerns of patients approaching the end of life is important for planning more equitable care. Data on this relationship is lacking, particularly for patients with non-cancer conditions.

Aim: To analyse the association between socioeconomic position and the symptoms and concerns of older adult patients seen by specialist palliative care.

Design: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional, routinely collected electronic patient data. We used multivariable linear regression with robust standard errors, to predict scores on the three subscales of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS; physical symptoms, emotional symptoms and communication and practical concerns) based on patient level of deprivation, measured using Index of Multiple Deprivation.

Setting/participants: Consecutive inpatients aged 60 years and over, seen by specialist palliative care at two large teaching hospitals in London between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2019.

Results: Seven thousand eight hundred and sixty patients were included, 38.3% had cancer. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients living in the most deprived areas had higher (worse) predicted mean scores on the communication and practical subscale than patients living in the least deprived areas, 5.38 (95% CI: 5.10, 5.65) compared to 4.82 (4.62, 5.02) respectively. This effect of deprivation diminished with increasing age. Deprivation was not associated with scores on the physical or emotional symptoms subscales.

Conclusions: Targetting resources to address practical and communication concerns could be a strategy to reduce inequalities. Further research in different hospitals and across different settings using patient centred outcome measures is needed to examine inequalities.

Keywords: Socioeconomic factors; health equity; palliative care; symptom assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Adjusted* regression coefficients and 95% CI for the association between patient level of area-based deprivation and Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) subscales. *Analysis adjusted for: age, sex, ethnicity, living alone, diagnosis, Phase of Illness, Australia-modified. Karnofsky Performance Status and hospital site
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Adjusted* linear effect and 95% CI of patient level of area-based deprivation on the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) communication/practical subscale, moderated by age (figure shows that the negative effect of being less deprived on the communication/practical subscale is stronger at younger ages and not statistically significant after age 83 years) *analysis adjusted for: age, sex, ethnicity, living alone, diagnosis, Phase of Illness, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status and hospital site.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davies JM, Sleeman KE, Leniz J, et al.. Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2019; 16: e1002878–e1002782. - PMC - PubMed
    1. French M, Keegan T, Anestis E, et al.. Exploring socioeconomic inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK: a narrative synthesis. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20: 188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rowley J, Richards N, Carduff E, et al.. The impact of poverty and deprivation at the end of life: a critical review. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2021; 15: 26323524211033873. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deerberg-Wittram J, Guth C, Porter ME. Value-based competition: the role of Outcome Measurement. Public Health Forum 2013; 21: 12–13.
    1. Bausewein C, Le Grice C, Simon S, et al.. The use of two common palliative outcome measures in clinical care and research: a systematic review of POS and STAS. Palliat Med 2011; 25: 304–313. - PubMed

Publication types