Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;42(3):140-153.
doi: 10.29173/jchla29579. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Canadian academics' use of predatory journals

Maureen Babb  1
Affiliations

Canadian academics' use of predatory journals

Maureen Babb. J Can Health Libr Assoc. .

Abstract

Introduction: Predatory journals have been acknowledged as an increasing concern in the scholarly literature over the last decade, but research on the subject has been sparse. Research that has focused on predatory journals in the Canadian context has been even rarer, and limited to work focused on a single university. This study explores publishing trends in predatory journals by authors affiliated with Canadian universities.

Methods: Articles published by authors at 30 Canadian universities, including all universities in the U15, were pulled from select predatory journals. Key data including author affiliation, article type, discipline, and grant information were extracted from the articles.

Results: All universities in the study were found to have publications in predatory journals. The health sciences accounted for 72% of the publications, and the sciences for 20%. Research articles accounted for 50% of the articles. Opinion, editorial, or commentary pieces accounted for 24% and 19% were review articles. Grant funding was indicated in 34% of the articles, with NSERC and CIHR being top funders. The research-intensive U15 universities were found to publish more in predatory journals than their non-U15 compatriots, even when the universities were of similar size.

Discussion: Canadian scholars were found to publish in predatory journals, particularly those scholars from the health sciences and research-intensive U15 universities. Grant funding was common, and often came from high profile funders like NSERC and CIHR. This study suggests that policy and education initiatives may be warranted in Canadian contexts, especially in the health sciences and at research-intensive universities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
– Broad Discipline
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
– Disciplines.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
– Repeat Authors
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
– Publications at U15 and Non-U15 Universities Considering Student Population.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
– Publications at U15 and Non-U15 Universities Considering Graduate Student Population.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
– Publications over time.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eriksson S, Helgesson G. Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’. Learned Publishing. 2017;31(2):181-3. doi: 10.1002/leap.1135. - DOI
    1. Laine C, Winker M. Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-journals. The National medical journal of India. 2017;30(1):1-6. - PubMed
    1. Ciro JB, Bowker L. Does a Predator Need Prey? Examining the Evolving Terminology of Predatory Publishing / Un prédateur a-t-il besoin de proies ? Analyse de l’évolution de la terminologie de l’édition prédatrice. Canadian journal of information and library science. 2021;43(3):195-216.
    1. Beall J. Predatory Open-Access Scholarly Publishers. The Charleston Advisor. 2010;11(4):10-7.
    1. McLeod A, Savage A, Simkin MG. The Ethics of Predatory Journals. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3419-9. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources