Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 6;10(1):coac055.
doi: 10.1093/conphys/coac055. eCollection 2022.

Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics

Affiliations

Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics

Elizabeth A McHuron et al. Conserv Physiol. .

Abstract

Bioenergetic approaches are increasingly used to understand how marine mammal populations could be affected by a changing and disturbed aquatic environment. There remain considerable gaps in our knowledge of marine mammal bioenergetics, which hinder the application of bioenergetic studies to inform policy decisions. We conducted a priority-setting exercise to identify high-priority unanswered questions in marine mammal bioenergetics, with an emphasis on questions relevant to conservation and management. Electronic communication and a virtual workshop were used to solicit and collate potential research questions from the marine mammal bioenergetic community. From a final list of 39 questions, 11 were identified as 'key' questions because they received votes from at least 50% of survey participants. Key questions included those related to energy intake (prey landscapes, exposure to human activities) and expenditure (field metabolic rate, exposure to human activities, lactation, time-activity budgets), energy allocation priorities, metrics of body condition and relationships with survival and reproductive success and extrapolation of data from one species to another. Existing tools to address key questions include labelled water, animal-borne sensors, mark-resight data from long-term research programs, environmental DNA and unmanned vehicles. Further validation of existing approaches and development of new methodologies are needed to comprehensively address some key questions, particularly for cetaceans. The identification of these key questions can provide a guiding framework to set research priorities, which ultimately may yield more accurate information to inform policies and better conserve marine mammal populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process for identifying key bioenergetic questions. Figure after Sutherland et al. (2022). The number of participants compared with invitees is shown in blue text for the initial question submission and the voting on final questions. The number of invitees increased from 62 to 82 due to additional participant suggestions by co-authors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The percentage of survey participants that voted for each of the 39 questions, ordered (and coloured) from least to greatest number of votes. Key questions were defined as those voted by at least 50% of participants. The inset pie graph shows the self-reported employment type of participants that voted in the final survey. The full phrasing of each question can be found in Fig. 3 and Table S2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The key outstanding bioenergetic questions identified as part of this exercise (left) and a conceptual diagram of where each question (excluding Q11) fits in the energy flow through an animal (grey circle). Questions are coloured based on the general categories of prey intake (green), energy expenditure on self (gold) and energy allocation and storage for other processes, such as reproduction (blue).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Examples of common and emerging tools or methodologies that can be used to address the key bioenergetic questions identified as part of this exercise. Questions (excluding Q11) are colour-coded as in Fig. 3, with black lines connecting the question to the tool/methodology. Bolded outlines correspond to tools/methodologies that are linked to multiple key questions. In some instances, these represent different tools for collecting the same type of data (e.g. unmanned vehicles and boat-based surveys using acoustic data to characterize prey landscapes), whereas in others they represent different methodologies to address the same question (e.g. eDNA vs. boat-based surveys to characterize prey landscapes).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acevedo J, Urbán J (2021) Estimates of Fuegian sprat consumption by humpback whales in the Magellan Strait feeding area as predicted by a bioenergetic model. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 657: 223–239.
    1. Adachi T, Takahashi A, Costa DP, Robinson PW, Hückstädt LA, Peterson SH, Holser RR, Beltran RS, Keates TR, Naito Y (2021) Forced into an ecological corner: round-the-clock deep foraging on small prey by elephant seals. Sci Adv 7: 21–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aoki K, Isojunno S, Bellot C, Iwata T, Kershaw J, Akiyama Y, Martín López LM, Ramp C, Biuw M, Swift Ret al. (2021) Aerial photogrammetry and tag-derived tissue density reveal patterns of lipid-store body condition of humpback whales on their feeding grounds. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 288: 20202307. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnbom T, Fedak MA, Boyd IL (1997) Factors affecting maternal expenditure in southern elephant seals during lactation. Ecology 78: 471–483.
    1. Arnould J, Boyd IL, Socha DG (1996a) Milk consumption and growth efficiency in Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) pups. Can J Zool 74: 254–266.