Bacterial profile of diabetic foot infections and antibiotic susceptibility in a specialized diabetes centre in Cameroon
- PMID: 35949468
- PMCID: PMC9307920
- DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.52.31042
Bacterial profile of diabetic foot infections and antibiotic susceptibility in a specialized diabetes centre in Cameroon
Abstract
Introduction: bacterial profile of diabetic foot infections and the antibiotic susceptibility are essential in the prescription of empirical antibiotics before the results of cultures of deep wound samples are available. The aim of this study was to determine the microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from infected diabetic foot ulcers in patients attending the Yaoundé Central Hospital, Cameroon.
Methods: we retrospectively analyzed the records of patients hospitalized between 2008 and 2013 for diabetic foot infections. The main outcomes were the bacteriological profile and susceptibility patterns of isolates from positive culture of deep wound sample before antibiotherapy, carried out in the national reference laboratory. Eligible clinical records of patients were retrieved from the hospitalization registry.
Results: a total of 101 patient records were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 57.1 ± 9.1 years. There were more males (64.4%), mostly with type 2 diabetes (99%), with a median duration of 9 years (IQR: 4 - 14 years). Their median blood sugar on admission was 246 mg/dL. Five percent of patients died and 23% had a major amputation. Two hundred and twenty-five (225) germs were isolated, with an average of 2.25 germs per patient. Gram-negative bacteria were more frequent (75.2%). These were mainly Morganella morganii (13.8%), Klebsiella pneumonia (12%), Escherichia coli (11.6%), Proteus spp. (10.7%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.9%). Gram-positive bacteria (24.8%) were mainly Staphylococcus aureus (9.3%), Streptococcus spp. (7.6%), and Enterococcus spp. (7.1%). Gram-negative bacteria showed a high resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (78%), fluoroquinolones (55%), and gentamycin (50%). They were susceptible to imipenem (95%), amikacin (88%), and show moderate susceptibility to third generation cephalosporins (62%). Gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycine (94%), and moderately susceptible to pristinamycine (82%) and fusidic acid (67%).
Conclusion: Gram-negative bacteria were more frequently associated with diabetic foot infections, and were frequently resistant to the usually prescribed antibiotics, but remain susceptible to imipenem and amikacin. Our findings should be considered when prescribing empirical anti-biotherapy for diabetic foot infections in our setting.
Keywords: Diabetic foot infections; antibiotic susceptibility.
Copyright: Mesmin Dehayem Yefou et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competitng interests.
Similar articles
-
Microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Malaysia: a retrospective study of 194 cases.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007 Feb;40(1):39-44. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007. PMID: 17332905
-
Microbial Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in China: Literature Review.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;13:881659. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.881659. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35663325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bacterial isolates from diabetic foot ulcers and their antimicrobial resistance profile from selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 31;13:987487. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.987487. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36120451 Free PMC article.
-
Distribution and drug sensitivity of pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot ulcer patients with necrotizing fasciitis at a diabetic foot center in China.BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07382-7. BMC Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35459117 Free PMC article.
-
Multidrug-Resistant and Virulent Organisms Trauma Infections: Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study Initiative.Mil Med. 2022 May 4;187(Suppl 2):42-51. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab131. Mil Med. 2022. PMID: 35512375 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment of Morganella morganii-Associated Non-healing Diabetic Foot Ulcer With Vaporous Hyperoxia Therapy: A Case Report.Cureus. 2024 May 16;16(5):e60413. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60413. eCollection 2024 May. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38883037 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from diabetic foot ulcers: A pathological aspect.Exp Ther Med. 2022 Dec 7;25(1):53. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11752. eCollection 2023 Jan. Exp Ther Med. 2022. PMID: 36588808 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic Stewardship in the Management of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcer Disease in Less Developed Countries.Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2024 Jul;7(4):e00503. doi: 10.1002/edm2.503. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2024. PMID: 38924696 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bacterial profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns of infected diabetic foot ulcers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 5;13(1):14655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41882-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37670001 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boulton AJM, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1719–24. - PubMed
-
- Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2003;361(9368):1545–51. - PubMed
-
- Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005;293(2):217–28. - PubMed
-
- International Diabetes Federation . 9th edition 2019. Diabetes atlas, Brussels, Belgium, IDF.
-
- Abbas ZG, Archibald LK. Epidemiology of the diabetic foot in Africa. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11(8):RA262–70. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous