Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;8(3):96-101.
doi: 10.20407/fmj.2021-017. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

Longitudinal study of the vaginal microbiome in pregnancies involving preterm labor

Affiliations

Longitudinal study of the vaginal microbiome in pregnancies involving preterm labor

Yoshiko Sakabe et al. Fujita Med J. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Alterations in the vaginal bacterial flora reflect the status of various obstetric conditions and are associated with mechanisms that underlie certain pregnancy-associated complications. These changes are also a predictive biomarker for clinical outcomes of these adverse events.

Methods: We examined the vaginal microbiome in samples from pregnant Japanese women with preterm labor.

Results: The microbiota composition in preterm delivery (PD) samples differed from those of control or threatened preterm delivery (TPD) samples in principal component analysis. An increase in Firmicutes and a decrease in Actinobacteria were significantly associated with PD only (both P<0.01). In the Firmicutes phylum, Lactobacillus tended to be abundant, and the abundance of L. iners and L. crispatus was especially high, whereas the L. gasseri population was low in PD samples. Longitudinal analysis showed that the abundance of L. iners decreased after commencing tocolytic treatment in TPD samples compared with before treatment, but it remained high in PD samples.

Conclusions: The vaginal microbiome may be a useful prognostic indicator of preterm labor and a monitoring tool for tocolytic treatment to prevent preterm birth.

Keywords: Lactobacillus iners; Preterm delivery; Vaginal microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparative analysis of vaginal microbiome profiles between the PD and TPD or control groups. A. Alpha diversity of the vaginal microbiome. The rare fraction curve was constructed using weighted UniFrac analysis. Red lines indicate the PD group and blue lines indicate the TPD and control groups. B. A PCA plot was constructed using weighted UniFrac analysis. Red, green, and blue circles indicate the PD, TPD, and control groups, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative abundance of different bacterial phyla in each sample. The seven most abundant bacterial phyla are indicated. One-way analysis of variance was performed for comparison between each group. Firmicutes: controls vs TPD, P=0.84; TPD vs PD, P=0.005; controls vs PD, P=0.0001. Actinobacteria: controls vs TPD, P=0.87; TPD vs PD, P=0.01; controls vs PD, P=0.001. Proteobacteria: controls vs TPD, P=0.61; TPD vs PD, P=0.65; controls vs PD, P=0.15.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Volcano plot of the relative abundance of each bacterial genus. The x-axis indicates the fold changes of genera in PD samples compared with non PD samples, while the y-axis indicates P values. A. Finegoldia (20-fold, P=0.17); B. Lactobacillus (2-fold, P=0.10); and C. Bifidobacterium (0.02-fold, P=0.46).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparative analysis of the relative abundance of Lactobacillus strains in the vaginal microbiome between the PD and non PD groups. A. Lactobacillus genus; B. L. iners; C. L. crispatus; and D. L. gasseri.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Longitudinal analysis of the abundance of strains of the Lactobacillus genus in the vaginal microbiome in the TPD group. The relative abundance of Lactobacillus was compared between pre- and post-tocolytic treatment for premature labor. A. Lactobacillus genus; B. L. crispatus; and C. L. iners. We also calculated the post- to pre-treatment ratio for the abundance of L. iners in the PD, TPD, and control groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, Adler A, Vera Garcia C, Rohde S, Say L, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012; 379: 2162–2172. - PubMed
    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 75–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lamont RF, Nhan-Chang CL, Sobel JD, Workowski K, Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Treatment of abnormal vaginal flora in early pregnancy with clindamycin for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 177–190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 139–147. - PubMed
    1. Romero R, Hassan SS, Gajer P, Tarca AL, Fadrosh DW, Bieda J, Chaemsaithong P, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, Ravel J. The vaginal microbiota of pregnant women who subsequently have spontaneous preterm labor and delivery and those with a normal delivery at term. Microbiome 2014; 2: 18. - PMC - PubMed