Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul-Aug;16(4):58-63.

Candida species colonization in oral lichen planus: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Candida species colonization in oral lichen planus: A meta-analysis

Alberto Rodriguez-Archilla et al. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2022 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common chronic inflammatory disease that affects 1%-2% of the population. Candida species superinfection can aggravate the symptoms of OLP, especially of the erosive forms, and promote malignant transformation by producing carcinogenics as nitrosamines or acetaldehyde. On the other hand, antifungal treatment of Candida-infected OLPs improves the clinical symptoms of the disease. The objective of this study is to assess the possible influence of Candida species colonization in oral lichen planus.

Methods: A search for studies on Candida and oral lichen planus was performed in the following databases: PubMed (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus. Data analysis: The estimated prevalence of Candida detection in OLP was calculated according to the DerSimonian and Laird random model. For dichotomous outcomes, the estimates of effects of an intervention were expressed as odds ratio (OR) using Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) method with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis. The estimated prevalence of Candida species detection in oral lichen planus (OLP) lesions was 37.00% (95% CI: 30.52-43.72%). OLP patients were almost 2½ times more likely to be infected by Candida species compared to healthy controls (OR: 2.48, P < 0.001). Likewise, Candida species superinfection was more likely in erosive OLP forms (OR: 2.53, P < 0.001), and by non-albicans Candida species (OR: 2.33, P = 0.02).

Conclusions: More than one-third of OLP lesions are infected by Candida species, modifying their biological behavior.

Keywords: Candida; candidiasis oral; lichen planus oral; microbiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study data and forest plot graph on the Candida species detection in patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) and controls without the disease
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot for publication bias

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rotaru DI, Sofineti D, Bolboacă SD, Bulboacă AE. Diagnostic criteria of oral lichen planus:A narrative review. Acta Clin Croat. 2020;59:513–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuten-Shorrer M, Menon RS, Lerman MA. Mucocutaneous diseases. Dent Clin North Am. 2020;64:139–62. - PubMed
    1. Ghone U, Sarode GS, Sengupta N, Sarode SC. Are fungi responsible for the pathogenesis of oral lichen planus? Med Hypotheses. 2021;156:110689. - PubMed
    1. Villa TG, Sánchez-Pérez Á, Sieiro C. Oral lichen planus:A microbiologist point of view. Int Microbiol. 2021;24:275–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baek K, Choi Y. The microbiology of oral lichen planus:Is microbial infection the cause of oral lichen planus? Mol Oral Microbiol. 2018;33:22–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources