Defining Duplex Ultrasound Criteria for In-Stent Restenosis of the Carotid Artery Using Computed Tomographic Angiography
- PMID: 35949740
- PMCID: PMC9358128
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26700
Defining Duplex Ultrasound Criteria for In-Stent Restenosis of the Carotid Artery Using Computed Tomographic Angiography
Abstract
Introduction Duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity measurement is the preferred method for evaluating carotid artery stenosis. However, velocity criteria based upon native carotid arteries may not apply to internal carotid artery stents. Previously, catheter-based angiography was used to determine DUS velocity criteria for in-stent restenosis (ISR), but conventional angiography is invasive and can be limited. This study sought to define duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for predicting internal carotid artery in-stent restenosis by correlating in-stent velocities with computed tomographic angiography (CTA) measurements of percent stenosis. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent internal carotid artery (ICA) stenting within our health system between January 2013 and February 2020. Thirty-eight surveillance DUS studies from 32 patients were found to have CTA performed within 30 days. Centerline reconstructions of internal carotid artery stents were created using Aquarius iNtuition software (TeraRecon, Durham, NC, USA). Two independent observers measured percent stenosis by three built-in methods. Stenotic areas were matched to DUS-measured peak systolic velocities (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV). Internal carotid artery PSV (stent) to common carotid artery (CCA) PSV ratios (ICA/CCA) were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The optimal DUS velocity criteria in the stented ICA were determined by maximizing Youden's index. Results Mean vessel diameter measurement of percent stenosis resulted in the most accurate model for all DUS velocity parameters (PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA ratio) and was used for threshold determinations (area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC): 0.99, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively). A PSV cutoff of 240 cm/s for ≥60% ISR resulted in the highest Youden's index (97%) with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Secondary DUS parameters included an EDV ≥50 cm/s (Youden's index 84%) and an ICA/CCA ratio ≥ 2.2 (Youden's index 91%). Conclusions Velocity criteria to predict internal carotid artery ISR is needed to inform decisions for possible reintervention. Using CTA, we found that a PSV ≥240 cm/s on carotid DUS can predict ≥60% ISR with high sensitivity and specificity. This value can be used as an alternative to current velocity criteria based on native carotid arteries. However, the optimal thresholds for EDV and ICA/CCA ratio were similar to native carotid arteries.
Keywords: carotid artery stenting; carotid in-stent restenosis; ct angiogram; duplex ultrasound; restenosis.
Copyright © 2022, Bitsko et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Role of carotid duplex in the assessment of carotid artery restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting.Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1226220. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1226220. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37965176 Free PMC article.
-
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038. J Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18178455
-
Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis.J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 30. J Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18586444
-
Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis.Vascular. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):119-25. doi: 10.2310/6670.2007.00030. Vascular. 2007. PMID: 17573016
-
Percutaneous Treatment of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report and State-of-the-Art Review.Am J Case Rep. 2015 Aug 21;16:558-62. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.894198. Am J Case Rep. 2015. PMID: 26294661 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Role of carotid duplex in the assessment of carotid artery restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting.Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1226220. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1226220. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37965176 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1493–1501. - PubMed
-
- 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. SPACE Collaborative Group, Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, et al. Lancet Lond Engl. 2006;368:1239–1247. - PubMed
-
- Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671. - PubMed
-
- Transcarotid artery revascularization as a new modality of treatment for carotid stenosis. Luk Y, Chan YC, Cheng SW. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;64:397–404. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous