Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan-Dec:21:15330338221118188.
doi: 10.1177/15330338221118188.

Age-Dependent Hematologic Toxicity Profiles and Prognostic Serologic Markers in Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Uterine Cervical Cancer

Affiliations

Age-Dependent Hematologic Toxicity Profiles and Prognostic Serologic Markers in Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Uterine Cervical Cancer

Eva Meixner et al. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: In the adjuvant setting for cervical cancer, classical risk factors for postoperative radiochemotherapy have been established. However, data on laboratory changes during therapy and the prognostic value of serological markers are limited and further knowledge is needed to optimize the toxic trimodal regimen. Methods: We retrospectively identified 69 women who underwent weekly postoperative radiochemotherapy with 40 mg/m2 of cisplatin for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2021 at a single center. Laboratory parameters were recorded before, at each cycle and after radiochemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to calculate and compare survival, groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, χ2, and variance tests. Results: With a median follow-up of 17.7 months, the 1- and 5-year local control rates were 94.0% and 73.7%, respectively, with significantly better rates for more chemotherapy cycles and negative resection margins. Only 68.1% of patients completed all cycles. The most common reasons for early discontinuation were persistent asymptomatic leukopenia in women aged ≤ 50 years, and limiting infections in women aged > 50 years. Leukopenia was more likely to occur after the third cycle. Significantly worse survival was observed for post-radiochemotherapy elevated C-reactive-protein and lactate dehydrogenase levels, low pre-radiochemotherapy nutritional index, and raised C-reactive-protein-levels; the latter were also predictable for local control. The Glasgow prognostic score did not reliably predict survival. Conclusion: Incomplete application of simultaneous chemotherapy leads to inferior local control, and age-dependent limiting factors should be identified at an early stage. In addition to classical risk factors, serological markers (C-reactive-protein, lactate dehydrogenase, nutritional index) show prognostic significance.

Keywords: adjuvant treatment; anemia; chemoradiation; gynecological neoplasm; hematotoxicity; leukopenia; systemic inflammatory markers; thrombocytopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest in this work. This research received no external funding. EM received speaker fees from Elekta outside the submitted work. LK received speaker fees and travel reimbursement from Accuray International Sàrl., and NovoCure outside the submitted work. JD received grants from Accuray International Sàrl, Merck Serono GmbH, CRI—The Clinical Research Institute GmbH, View Ray Inc., Accuray Incorporated, RaySearch Laboratories AB, Vision RT limited, Astellas Pharma GmbH, Astra Zeneca GmbH, Solution Akademie GmbH, Ergomed PLC Surrey Research Park, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Quintiles GmbH, NovoCure, Pharmaceutecal Research Associates GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH Co, PTW-Freiburg Dr Pychlau GmbH, Nanobiotix A.A. and IntraOP Medical outside the submitted work. JHR received speaker fees and travel reimbursement from ViewRay Inc., travel reimbursement from IntraOP Medical and Elekta Instrument AB, a grant from IntraOP Medical outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier estimates with overall survival (A), local control (B), distant control (C). n(risk): number at risk.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Boxplots with first and third quartiles, minimum, maximum and median values of peripheral blood cell counts with hemoglobin levels (g/dl) (A), leukocyte count (per nl) (B), platelet count (per nl) (C), glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m2) (D), body mass index (kg/m2) (E), and absolute body weight (kilogram) (F) at the timepoint of each cycle.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(3):209‐249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. PMID: 33538338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mix JM, Van Dyne EA, Saraiya M, Hallowell BD, Thomas CC. Assessing impact of HPV vaccination on cervical cancer incidence among women aged 15–29 years in the United States, 1999–2017: an ecologic study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(1):30‐37. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0846. PMID: 33082207; PMCID: PMC7855406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Zaridze D, et al. Preventable fractions of cervical cancer via effective screening in six Baltic, central, and eastern European countries 2017-40: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1445‐1452. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30275-3. PMID: 27567054; PMCID: PMC5052457. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jansen EEL, Zielonke N, Gini A, et al. de Kok IMCM; EU-TOPIA consortium. Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2020;127:207‐223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.013. PMID: 31980322. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 2):22‐36. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12611. PMID: 30306584. - DOI - PubMed