AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams
- PMID: 35950259
- PMCID: PMC9512346
- DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13641
AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams
Abstract
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines: Must and Must Not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. While must is the term to be used in the guidelines, if an entity that adopts the guideline has shall as the preferred term, the AAPM considers that must and shall have the same meaning. Should and Should Not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances.
Keywords: Dose calculations; MPPG; practice guideline; treatment planning.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Figures
Similar articles
-
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):14–34. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5768. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 26699330 Free PMC article.
-
AAPM Medical physics practice guideline 15.A: Peer review in clinical physics.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Oct;24(10):e14151. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14151. Epub 2023 Sep 14. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 37708093 Free PMC article.
-
Medical physics practice guideline 4.b: Development, implementation, use and maintenance of safety checklists.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Mar;24(3):e13895. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13895. Epub 2023 Feb 4. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 36739483 Free PMC article.
-
Practice guideline for the breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma.J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Aug;205(2):362-376. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.057. J Am Coll Surg. 2007. PMID: 17660085 Review.
-
Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56. American Association of Physicists in Medicine.Med Phys. 1997 Oct;24(10):1557-98. doi: 10.1118/1.597966. Med Phys. 1997. PMID: 9350711 Review.
Cited by
-
AAPM task group report 135.B: Quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery.Med Phys. 2025 Jan;52(1):45-76. doi: 10.1002/mp.17478. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 39453412 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Monaco 6.2.2 in complex radiotherapy across matched LINACs: improved MLC modelling and dose accuracy with virtual source model 2.0.Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s13246-025-01602-5. Online ahead of print. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025. PMID: 40690180
-
Quantitative approaches in electron skin collimation for the practical benefits.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Apr;25(4):e14236. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14236. Epub 2023 Dec 5. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 38050939 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Commissioning and implementation of a pencil-beam algorithm with a Lorentz correction as a secondary dose calculation algorithm for an Elekta Unity 1.5T MR linear accelerator.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Mar;26(3):e14590. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14590. Epub 2024 Dec 3. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 39625056 Free PMC article.
-
3D gamma analysis between treatment plans for nominally beam-matched medical linear accelerators using PyMedPhys.Precis Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov 27;8(4):191-199. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1247. eCollection 2024 Dec. Precis Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 40337454 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, et al. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 1998;25(10):1773‐1829. - PubMed
-
- International Atomic Energy Agency . Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer. International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004.
-
- Das IJ, Cheng CW, Watts RJ, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG‐106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35(9):4186‐4215. - PubMed
-
- Glide‐Hurst C, Bellon M, Foster R, et al. Commissioning of the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator: a multi‐institutional study. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031719. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources