Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;32(10):1193-1200.
doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0217. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

Tumor Grade Predicts for Calcitonin Doubling Times and Disease-Specific Outcomes After Resection of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Affiliations

Tumor Grade Predicts for Calcitonin Doubling Times and Disease-Specific Outcomes After Resection of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Aradhya Nigam et al. Thyroid. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Tumor grade is a new validated prognostic factor for medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Calcitonin doubling time can predict MTC recurrence. We aimed to describe the association of tumor grade with calcitonin doubling and its effect on disease-specific outcomes times after resection. Methods: A retrospective analysis of MTC patients who underwent resection at a single tertiary-care cancer center between 1986 and 2017 were evaluated. Tumors were designated as high-grade MTC if two head and neck pathologists identified mitotic index ≥5 per 2 mm2, tumor necrosis, or a Ki67 proliferative index ≥5% within the tumor. Calcitonin doubling time was calculated using a validated calculator with at least three consecutive levels. Using Cox proportional hazards models, outcomes evaluated included locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 117 patients, 95 were low grade and 22 high grade. Median follow-up was 70.2 months. High-grade patients demonstrated significantly faster calcitonin doubling times when compared with low-grade patients (8.51 ± 3.22 months vs. 38.42 ± 11.19 months; p < 0.001). In addition, most high-grade patients (66.7%) had calcitonin doubling times less than 1 year compared with fewer low-grade patients (1.0%; p < 0.001). High- and low-grade patients were further stratified by those who had calcitonin doubling times less than or greater than 2 years-a previously validated prognostic cutoff point. For patients with calcitonin doubling times less than 2 years, 70% were high grade, while 30% were low grade (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis comparing grade and calcitonin doubling times, high-grade patients had significantly worse LRFS (hazards ratio [HR] 4.77 [confidence interval; CI 1.19-8.81]), DMFS (HR 7.25 [CI 2.36-22.28]), and OS (HR 6.04 [CI 1.85-19.72]; p < 0.05 for all), while calcitonin doubling times less than 2 years had worse DMFS (HR 7.22 [CI 1.05-49.75]). High-grade patients with calcitonin doubling times less than 2 years had associated worse LRFS and OS (both p < 0.05) compared with low-grade patients. Conclusions: The majority of high-grade MTC patients have calcitonin doubling times less than 2years. Close monitoring should be advocated for patients assessed to have high-grade tumors as they are at risk for poor disease-specific outcomes and structural recurrence.

Keywords: IMTCGS; MTC grading; MTC surveillance; calcitonin doubling times; medullary thyroid carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Flowchart visualizing inclusion and exclusion criteria of the 117 nondistant metastatic surgically treated MTC patients. MTC, medullary thyroid cancer.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Univariate survival analysis comparing high- and low-grade patient among patients with calcitonin doubling time less than 2 years using log-rank tests. High-grade patients in this cohort were associated with worse LRFS (left panel) and OS (right panel) when compared with low-grade patients (p < 0.05 for both). DMFS (middle panel) among patients was not statistically different between high- and low-grade patients (p = 0.06). DMFS, distant metastasis-free survival; LRFS, locoregional relapse-free survival; OS, overall survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kebebew E, Ituarte PH, Siperstein AE, et al. . Medullary thyroid carcinoma: Clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 2000;88(5):1139–1148; doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<1139::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wells Jr SA, Asa SL, Dralle H, et al. . Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2015;25(6):567–610; doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0335. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filetti S, Durante C, Hartl D, et al. . Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-updagger. Ann Oncol 2019;30(12):1856–1883; doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz400. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Modigliani E, Cohen R, Campos JM, et al. . Prognostic factors for survival and for biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinoma: Results in 899 patients. The GETC Study Group. Groupe d'etude des tumeurs a calcitonine. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998;48(3):265–273; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00392.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roman S, Lin R, Sosa JA. Prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma: Demographic, clinical, and pathologic predictors of survival in 1252 cases. Cancer 2006;107(9):2134–2142; doi: 10.1002/cncr.22244. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts