Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Radical Prostatectomy: A Turkish Multicenter Study
- PMID: 35950833
- PMCID: PMC9623386
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2022.22130
Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Radical Prostatectomy: A Turkish Multicenter Study
Abstract
Objective: The present study examines the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on radical prostatectomy performed as part of localized prostate cancer treatment in Turkey.
Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was made of the data of 176 patients from 8 centers in Turkey who underwent radical prostatectomy due to localized prostate cancer over the 2 years spanning March 1, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Within this timeframe, March 1, 2019, to February 28, 2020, was denoted the 1-year pre-coronavirus disease 2019 period, while March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, was denoted the 1-year coronavirus disease 2019 period. An analysis was made of whether there was a difference in the number of radical prostatectomies performed for prostate cancer, the time from biopsy to operation, and the biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology between the 2 periods.
Results: It was found that the number of radical prostatectomies performed for localized prostate cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was statistically and highly significantly fewer than in the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 period (P <.001). The patients diagnosed with Gleason 3+3 (low risk) prostate cancer were statistically significantly fewer in number in the coronavirus disease 2019 period (P <.001). The pathological Gleason score was upgrading than the biopsy Gleason score in all patients who underwent in both periods (P <.001). When the periods were compared, the pathological involvement determined by lymph node dissection performed during radical prostatectomy was found to be decreased in the coronavirus disease 2019 period, although the difference was not statistically significant (P =.051).
Conclusion: As with many diseases, the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer have been adversely affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Similar articles
-
Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.Eur Urol. 2000 Mar;37(3):297-300. doi: 10.1159/000052359. Eur Urol. 2000. PMID: 10720855
-
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 15145152
-
[Risk factors of ISUP Modified Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy].Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2016 May;22(5):415-9. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2016. PMID: 27416665 Chinese.
-
No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.064. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15028451 Review.
-
Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.Eur Urol. 2000 Jun;37(6):670-4. doi: 10.1159/000020216. Eur Urol. 2000. PMID: 10828666 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of COVID-19 on Uro-Oncological Patients: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Microorganisms. 2023 Jan 10;11(1):176. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010176. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 36677468 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mueller N, Grufferman S, Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
-
- Wang MC, Valenzuela LA, Murphy GP, Chu TM. Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Invest Urol. 1979;17(2):159 1 63. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials