Reply: Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation
- PMID: 35951039
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009527
Reply: Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation
Comment on
-
Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):940e-947e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007991. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021. PMID: 33973933
-
Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):916e-917e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009526. Epub 2022 Aug 11. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. PMID: 35951057 No abstract available.
References
-
- Weltz TK, Larsen A, Hemmingsen MN, et al. Breast augmentation with microtextured anatomical implants in 653 women: Indications and risk of rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147:940e–947e.
-
- Larsen A, Aaberg FL, Hemmingsen MN, et al. Deskinning in inverted-T mastopexy and augmentation mastopexy: A retrospective cohort study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45:423–430.
-
- Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:642e–656e.
-
- Swanson E. Photometric evaluation of inframammary crease level after cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:832–837.
-
- Hedén P, Montemurro P, Adams WP Jr, Germann G, Scheflan M, Maxwell GP. Anatomical and round breast implants: How to select and indications for use. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:263–272.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
