Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation
- PMID: 35951057
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009526
Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation
Comment in
-
Reply: Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):917e-919e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009527. Epub 2022 Aug 11. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. PMID: 35951039 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):940e-947e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007991. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021. PMID: 33973933
References
-
- Weltz TK, Larsen A, Hemmingsen MN, et al. Breast augmentation with microtextured anatomical implants in 653 women: Indications and risk of rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147:940e–947e.
-
- Hall-Findlay EJ. The three breast dimensions: Analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1632–1642.
-
- Swanson E. Prospective photographic measurement study of 196 cases of breast augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:802e–819e.
-
- Swanson E. Photometric evaluation of inframammary crease level after cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:832–837.
-
- Hidalgo DA. Discussion: Anatomical and round implants: How to select and indications for use. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:273–275.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
