Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;23(1):e2-e21.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00291-2. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

Respiratory syncytial virus prevention within reach: the vaccine and monoclonal antibody landscape

Affiliations
Review

Respiratory syncytial virus prevention within reach: the vaccine and monoclonal antibody landscape

Natalie I Mazur et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus is the second most common cause of infant mortality and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults (aged >60 years). Efforts to develop a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine or immunoprophylaxis remain highly active. 33 respiratory syncytial virus prevention candidates are in clinical development using six different approaches: recombinant vector, subunit, particle-based, live attenuated, chimeric, and nucleic acid vaccines; and monoclonal antibodies. Nine candidates are in phase 3 clinical trials. Understanding the epitopes targeted by highly neutralising antibodies has resulted in a shift from empirical to rational and structure-based vaccine and monoclonal antibody design. An extended half-life monoclonal antibody for all infants is likely to be within 1 year of regulatory approval (from August, 2022) for high-income countries. Live-attenuated vaccines are in development for older infants (aged >6 months). Subunit vaccines are in late-stage trials for pregnant women to protect infants, whereas vector, subunit, and nucleic acid approaches are being developed for older adults. Urgent next steps include ensuring access and affordability of a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine globally. This review gives an overview of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines and monoclonal antibodies in clinical development highlighting different target populations, antigens, and trial results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests UMCU received minor funding from The Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute. DMW has received consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck, Affinivax, and Matrivax, unrelated to this manuscript; and is a principal investigator with grant support from Pfizer and Merck to Yale University, unrelated to this manuscript. NIM has regular interaction with pharameutical and other industrial partners: UMC Utrecht has received fees for invited lectures by Abbvie, Merck, and Sanofi. LB has regular interaction with pharmaceutical and other industrial partners. BSG is an inventor of patents for RSV vaccines using the stabilised prefusion F protein. AM has received research grants from National Institutes of Health, Janssen, and Merck institution; fees for participation in advisory boards from Janssen, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Merck; and fees for educational lectures from Sanofi-Pasteur and AstraZeneca. TJR was financially supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health. BSG was financially supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health. UJB was financially supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health. UMCU has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MedImmune, Janssen, Pfizer, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and MeMed Diagnostics. UMCU has received major cash or in-kind funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU project from GSK, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in the INFORM study sponsored by MedImmune. UMCU has received minor funding for participation in trials by Regeneron and Janssen from 2015-17 (total annual estimate less than €20 000). UMCU received minor funding for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, MedImmune, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, Novavax, Pfizer, and Janssen (total annual estimate less than €20 000). Dr. Bont is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Pediatric RSV Disease Burden: Key facts and figures
A. Contribution to RSV for worldwide pneumonia: Approximately one-third of worldwide pneumonia is caused by RSV. B. RSV-related deaths: More than 99% of the RSV pediatric global mortality burden occurs in LMICs. Access to care seems a key driver of the inequitable distribution of the mortality burden as less than one fourth of these children have access to an intensive care. At least half of this burden was previously hidden, as it occurs out-of-hospital. Recently the out-of-hospital burden has been characterized and is distinct from the in-hospital mortality burden which has implications for global vaccine development: out-of-hospital children die at a younger age and risk factors are linked to poverty instead of underlying conditions. C. Total Costs: Estimated direct associated with RSV exceed 3 billion USD in LMICs, with additional direct non-medical and indirect costs. D. Expected vaccine impact: The cost-effectiveness and potential impact of maternal immunization (MI) vs mAb (monoclonal antibody) has been estimated in deaths averted and discounted DALYs (disability adjusted life-years).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Overview of vaccine candidates by preventive approach
Pre- and post-fusion proteins were created with RCSB PDB 5C6B, and 3RRT,, respectively.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. RSV vaccine and mAb candidates by target population.
Vaccine candidates and mAbs are categorized into three different target populations: (1) pediatric, (2) maternal, and (3) older adults and clinical phase of development: Phase I, II, or III. Different immunization approaches are indicated by the legend at the bottom. The route of administration is indicated in the small purple circles at the right: (1) intramuscular (IM), (2) intranasal (IN), (3) intradermal.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Historical perspective of RSV vaccine and immunoprophylaxis development over the last ten years and expected market access
Candidates that are in ongoing development (purple) or no longer in development (red) are presented at the timing of the clinical trials rounded off to full years. The darkness of the color represents the furthest development (Phase I – III) of the candidate. Candidates with multiple clinical trials are connected with full or dotted lines to show the speed of development. Live attenuated viruses by the same manufacturer are summarized in one box as development of these candidates largely overlaps. The timing of current and previous reviews are shown at the top.

References

    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2095–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nair H, Brooks WA, Katz M, et al. Global burden of respiratory infections due to seasonal influenza in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 378: 1917–30. - PubMed
    1. Srikantiah P, Vora P, Klugman KP. Assessing the Full Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Young Infants in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The Importance of Community Mortality Studies. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73: S177–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulkow LR, Singleton RJ, Karron RA, Harrison LH. Risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus infection among Alaska Native children. Pediatrics 2002. DOI:10.1542/peds.109.2.210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beckhaus AA, Castro-Rodriguez JA. Down syndrome and the risk of severe RSV infection: A meta-Analysis. Pediatrics. 2018. DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-0225. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances