Needs of Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy and Acceptance of Digital and Sensor-Based Scenarios for Monitoring Symptoms at Home-A Qualitative-Explorative Study
- PMID: 35954619
- PMCID: PMC9368591
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159265
Needs of Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy and Acceptance of Digital and Sensor-Based Scenarios for Monitoring Symptoms at Home-A Qualitative-Explorative Study
Abstract
Background: The development of immunotherapy in the treatment for lung cancer has changed the outlook for both patients and health care practitioners. However, reporting and management of side effects are crucial to ensure effectiveness and safety of treatment. The aim of this study was to learn about the subjective experiences of patients with lung cancer receiving immunotherapy and to explore their potential acceptance of digital and sensor-based systems for monitoring treatment-related symptoms at home.
Methods: A qualitative-explorative interview study with patients with lung cancer (n = 21) applying qualitative content analysis.
Results: Participants had trouble to classify and differentiate between symptoms they experienced and it seemed challenging to assess whether symptoms are serious enough to be reported and to figure out the right time to report symptoms to health care practitioners. We identified four basic needs: (1) the need to be informed, (2) the need for a trustful relationship, (3) the need to be taken seriously, and (4) the need for needs-oriented treatment concepts. The idea of digital and sensor-based monitoring initially provoked rejection, but participants expressed more differentiated attitudes during the interviews, which could be integrated into a preliminary model to explain the acceptance of digital and sensor-based monitoring scenarios.
Conclusions: Supporting lung cancer patients and their health care providers in communicating about treatment-related symptoms is important. Technology-based monitoring systems are considered to be potentially beneficial. However, in view of the many unfulfilled information needs and the unsatisfactory reporting of symptoms, it must be critically questioned what these systems can and should compensate for, and where the limits of such monitoring lie.
Keywords: adverse events; content analysis; immunotherapy; lung cancer; palliative care; patient’s needs; preferences; qualitative research methods; side effects; technology acceptance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Digital Monitoring and Management of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Cancer Immunotherapy and Its Impact on Quality of Clinical Care: Interview and Survey Study Among Health Care Professionals and Patients.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 21;22(12):e18655. doi: 10.2196/18655. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33346738 Free PMC article.
-
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447011
-
Unpleasant symptoms of immunotherapy for people with lung cancer: A mixed-method study.Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Mar;139:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104430. Epub 2022 Dec 15. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023. PMID: 36638590
-
Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 29;23(11):e26522. doi: 10.2196/26522. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34847057 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Experience and Needs of Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70211. doi: 10.1002/pon.70211. Psychooncology. 2025. PMID: 40616240 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of decision tools during oncological consultation with lung cancer patients: A systematic review within the I3LUNG project.Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(9):e7159. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7159. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 38741546 Free PMC article.
-
The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12610-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40140980 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sgambato A., Casaluce F., Sacco P.C., Palazzolo G., Maione P., Rossi A., Ciardiello F., Gridelli C. Anti PD-1 and PDL-1 Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Review on Toxicity Profile and its Management. Curr. Drug Saf. 2016;11:62–68. doi: 10.2174/1574886311207040289. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Micholt J.-M., Bigenwald C., Champiat S., Collins M., Carbonnel F., Postel-Vinay S., Berdelou A., Varga A.I., Bahleda R., Hollebecque A., et al. Immune-related adverse events with im-mune checkpoint blockade: A comprehensive review. Eur. J. Cancer. 2016;54:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.016. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical