Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 28;11(15):4386.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11154386.

Screening Tool to Identify Patients with Advanced Aortic Valve Stenosis

Sameh Yousef  1 , Andrea Amabile  1 , Chirag Ram  1 , Huang Huang  2 , Varun Korutla  1 , Saket Singh  1 , Ritu Agarwal  3 , Roland Assi  1 , Rita K Milewski  1 , Yawei Zhang  2 , Prakash A Patel  4 , Markus Krane  1 , Arnar Geirsson  1 , Prashanth Vallabhajosyula  1
Affiliations

Screening Tool to Identify Patients with Advanced Aortic Valve Stenosis

Sameh Yousef et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

(1) Background: The clinical burden of aortic stenosis (AS) remains high in Western countries. Yet, there are no screening algorithms for this condition. We developed a risk prediction model to guide targeted screening for patients with AS. (2) Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of all echocardiographic studies performed between 2013 and 2018 at a tertiary academic care center. We included reports of unique patients aged from 40 to 95 years. A logistic regression model was fitted for the risk of moderate and severe AS, with readily available demographics and comorbidity variables. Model performance was assessed by the C-index, and its calibration was judged by a calibration plot. (3) Results: Among the 38,788 reports yielded by inclusion criteria, there were 4200 (10.8%) patients with ≥moderate AS. The multivariable model demonstrated multiple variables to be associated with AS, including age, male gender, Caucasian race, Body Mass Index ≥ 30, and cardiovascular comorbidities and medications. C-statistics of the model was 0.77 and was well calibrated according to the calibration plot. An integer point system was developed to calculate the predicted risk of ≥moderate AS, which ranged from 0.0002 to 0.7711. The lower 20% of risk was approximately 0.15 (corresponds to a score of 252), while the upper 20% of risk was about 0.60 (corresponds to a score of 332 points). (4) Conclusions: We developed a risk prediction model to predict patients' risk of having ≥moderate AS based on demographic and clinical variables from a large population cohort. This tool may guide targeted screening for patients with advanced AS in the general population.

Keywords: aortic; mortality; prediction; risk; stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Geirsson receives a consulting fee for being a member of the Medtronic Strategic Surgical Advisory Board. Medtronic produces valve products for valve replacement and repairs. Krane is a physician proctor and a member of the medical advisory board for JOMDD, a physician proctor for Peter Duschek, and has received speakers’ honoraria from Medtronic and Terumo. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analytic cohort building. Consort diagram describing the inclusion and exclusion steps that led to the final analytic cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Discrimination ability of the model (to classify patients into moderate/severe AS versus no AS).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration of the model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nathaniel S., Saligram S., Innasimuthu A.L. Aortic stenosis: An update. World J. Cardiol. 2010;2:135–139. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i6.135. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beydoun H.A., Beydoun M.A., Liang H., Dore G.A., Shaked D., Zonderman A.B., Eid S.M. Sex, Race, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Patients With Aortic Stenosis (from a Nationwide Inpatient Sample) Am. J. Cardiol. 2016;118:860–865. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osnabrugge R.L., Mylotte D., Head S.J., Van Mieghem N.M., Nkomo V.T., LeReun C.M., Bogers A.J., Piazza N., Kappetein A.P. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: Disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis and modeling study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013;62:1002–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tang L., Gössl M., Ahmed A., Garberich R., Bradley S.M., Niikura H., Witt D., Pedersen W.R., Bae R., Lesser J.R., et al. Contemporary Reasons and Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Not Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018;11:e007220. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007220. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziaeian B., Fonarow G.C. Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2016;13:368–378. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.25. - DOI - PMC - PubMed