Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 30;11(15):4439.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11154439.

Obstetric Outcomes after Perforation of Uterine Cavity

Affiliations

Obstetric Outcomes after Perforation of Uterine Cavity

Polina Schwarzman et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the pregnancy characteristics and obstetric outcomes in patients after perforation of the uterus. Study design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted and included all patients who were diagnosed with uterine perforation and treated in a tertiary referral medical center between the years 1996 and 2018. Up to two deliveries after perforations were investigated. Results: During the study period, 51 women were diagnosed with uterine perforation during gynecological procedures, including intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 27.9 (±4.7) years. The majority, 76.5% (n = 39), experienced perforation during IUD insertion, and 23.5% (n = 12) of the patients experienced perforation during surgical procedures. Most of the patients were multiparous or grand multiparous, 45.8. % (n = 22) and 39.6% (n = 19) respectively. Anteflexed uterus was found in 86.4% of the patients (n = 38). Five patients (9.8%) had pelvic abscesses after the IUD insertion. A total of 50 patients had 71 deliveries subsequent to uterine perforation. One patient experienced intrauterine fetal death due to fetal malformations. One patient experienced uterine rupture. No other major obstetric complications were noted. Conclusions: Uterine perforation may be associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. The possibility of uterine rupture must be considered while managing the deliveries of patients after uterine perforation. Moreover, a larger cohort and further studies are needed to establish an association between uterine perforation and adverse outcomes of the subsequent deliveries.

Keywords: gynecological procedure; obstetric outcomes; uterine perforation; uterine rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sullivan B., Kenney P., Seibel M. Hysteroscopic resection of fibroid with thermal injury to sigmoid. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992;80:546–547. - PubMed
    1. Jansen F.W., Vredevoogd C.B., van Ulzen K., Hermans J., Trimbos J.B., Trimbos-Kemper T.C. Complications of hysteroscopy: A prospective, multicenter study. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;96:266–270. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200008000-00021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heinemann K., Reed S., Moehner S., Minh T.D. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015;91:274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnett C., Moehner S., Do Minh T., Heinemann K. Perforation risk and intra-uterine devices: Results of the EURAS-IUD 5-year extension study. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care. 2017;22:424–428. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1412427. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heinemann K., Barnett C., Reed S., Mohner S., Do Minh T. IUD use among parous women and risk of uterine perforation: A secondary analysis. Contraception. 2017;95:605–607. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.007. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources