Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 29;12(15):2620.
doi: 10.3390/nano12152620.

Graphene-Based Ion-Selective Field-Effect Transistor for Sodium Sensing

Affiliations

Graphene-Based Ion-Selective Field-Effect Transistor for Sodium Sensing

Ting Huang et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Field-effect transistors have attracted significant attention in chemical sensing and clinical diagnosis, due to their high sensitivity and label-free operation. Through a scalable photolithographic process in this study, we fabricated graphene-based ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET) arrays that can continuously monitor sodium ions in real-time. As the sodium ion concentration increased, the current-gate voltage characteristic curves shifted towards the negative direction, showing that sodium ions were captured and could be detected over a wide concentration range, from 10-8 to 10-1 M, with a sensitivity of 152.4 mV/dec. Time-dependent measurements and interfering experiments were conducted to validate the real-time measurements and the highly specific detection capability of our sensor. Our graphene ISFETs (G-ISFET) not only showed a fast response, but also exhibited remarkable selectivity against interference ions, including Ca2+, K+, Mg2+ and NH4+. The scalability, high sensitivity and selectivity synergistically make our G-ISFET a promising platform for sodium sensing in health monitoring.

Keywords: graphene; ion-selective field-effect transistor; real-time monitoring; sodium ions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Optical image of as-fabricated GFETs, (b) Optical image of the graphene channel and source/drain electrode. (c) Raman spectrum of a graphene channel after the fabrication process. Two characteristic peaks were found: G peak at ~1580 cm1 and 2D peak at ~2700 cm−1 (d) The line scan profile of the as-annealed GFET, Inset: AFM image with scan line indicated. The thickness of the graphene channel is ~0.5 nm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Current-gate voltage characteristic of an array of 100 graphene field-effect transistors. Histograms and Gaussian fits (black lines) of (b) Dirac voltage and (c) hole mobility extracted from the curves in panel a. (d) Current-gate voltage characteristic curves before and after ionophore deposition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Schematic of a back-gated G-ISFET. (b) Schematic of ionophore-functionalized GFET. The sodium ions captured in ionophores lead to a doping effect of the GFET.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Transport characteristic curves of G-ISFET against different Na+ concentrations from 10−8 to 10−1 M with a bias voltage of 100 mV. (b) G-ISFET response as a function for different target sodium concentrations at the logarithmic scale. A response of 152.4 mV/dec was observed.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Real-time response of the source–drain current against a series of Na+ molar concentrations (Vg = 0 V). (b) The linear response in IDS with different sodium concentrations from the real–time measurements in panel a.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) The selectivity test against several interfering ions. Error bars are the standard deviation of the mean. (b) Real-time responses of G-ISFET against human sweat samples collected from a sporting volunteer.

References

    1. Lerch M.M., Hansen M.J., van Dam G.M., Szymanski W., Feringa B.L. Emerging Targets in Photopharmacology. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2016;55:10978–10999. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reynolds R.M., Padfield P.L., Seckl J.R. Disorders of sodium balance. BMJ. 2006;332:702–705. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7543.702. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. He F.J., MacGregor G.A. Plasma sodium and hypertension. Kidney Int. 2004;66:2454–2466. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.66018.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thulborn K., Lui E., Guntin J., Jamil S., Sun Z., Claiborne T.C., Atkinson I.C. Quantitative sodium MRI of the human brain at 9.4 T provides assessment of tissue sodium concentration and cell volume fraction during normal aging. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:137–143. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3312. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inglese M., Madelin G., Oesingmann N., Babb J., Wu W., Stoeckel B., Herbert J., Johnson G. Brain tissue sodium concentration in multiple sclerosis: A sodium imaging study at 3 tesla. Brain. 2010;133:847–857. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed