Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;22(15):5763.
doi: 10.3390/s22155763.

Blockchain Based Delay and Energy Harvest Aware Healthcare Monitoring System in WBAN Environment

Affiliations

Blockchain Based Delay and Energy Harvest Aware Healthcare Monitoring System in WBAN Environment

Helen Sharmila Anbarasan et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Wireless body area networks (WBANs) are a research area that supports patients with healthcare monitoring. In WBAN, the Internet of Things (IoT) is connected with WBAN for a smart/remote healthcare monitoring system in which various medical diseases are diagnosed. Quality of service (QoS), security and energy efficiency achievements are the major issues in the WBAN-IoT environment. Existing schemes for these three issues fail to achieve them since nodes are resource constrained and hence delay and the energy consumption is minimized. In this paper, a blockchain-assisted delay and energy aware healthcare monitoring (B-DEAH) system is presented in the WBAN-IoT environment. Both body sensors and environment sensors are deployed with dual sinks for emergency and periodical packet transmission. Various processes are involved in this paper, and each process is described as follows: Key registration for patients using an extended version of the PRESENT algorithm is proposed. Cluster formation and cluster head selection are implemented using spotted hyena optimizer. Then, cluster-based routing is established using the MOORA algorithm. For data transmission, the patient block agent (PBA) is deployed and authenticated using the four Q curve asymmetric algorithm. In PBA, three entities are used: classifier and queue manager, channel selector and security manager. Each entity is run by a special function, as packets are classified using two stream deep reinforcement learning (TS-DRL) into three classes: emergency, non-emergency and faulty data. Individual packets are put into a separate queue, which is called emergency, periodical and faulty. Each queue is handled using Reyni entropy. Periodical packets are forwarded by a separate channel without any interference using a multi objective based channel selection algorithm. Then, all packets are encrypted and forwarded to the sink nodes. Simulation is conducted using the OMNeT++ network simulator, in which diverse parameters are evaluated and compared with several existing works in terms of network throughput for periodic (41.75 Kbps) and emergency packets (42.5 Kbps); end-to-end delay for periodic (0.036 s) and emergency packets (0.028 s); packet loss rate (1.1%); residual energy in terms of simulation rounds based on periodic (0.039 J) and emergency packets (0.044 J) and in terms of simulation time based on periodic (8.35 J) and emergency packets (8.53 J); success rate for periodic (87.83%) and emergency packets (87.5%); authentication time (3.25 s); and reliability (87.83%).

Keywords: blockchain; internet of things; quality of service (QoS); secure cluster based routing; wireless body area networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
System architecture.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Security evaluation for WBAN.
Figure 3
Figure 3
TS-DNN environment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Extended version of PRESENT algorithm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Network topology.
Figure 6
Figure 6
OMNeT++ simulation environment for multiple ban and body sensors in single ban.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Block diagram for CVD patients diagnosis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Network throughput vs. simulation rounds (emergency packets).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Network throughput vs. simulation rounds (periodic packets).
Figure 10
Figure 10
End-to-end delay vs. simulation rounds (emergency packets).
Figure 11
Figure 11
End-to-end delay vs. simulation rounds (periodic packets.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Packet loss rate vs. simulation rounds.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Authentication time vs. number of nodes.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Residual energy vs. simulation rounds (emergency packets).
Figure 15
Figure 15
Residual energy vs. simulation rounds (periodic packets).
Figure 16
Figure 16
Residual energy vs. simulation time (s) (emergency packets).
Figure 17
Figure 17
Residual energy vs. simulation time (s) (periodic packets).
Figure 18
Figure 18
Success rate vs. simulation time (emergency packets).
Figure 19
Figure 19
Success rate vs. simulation time (periodic packets).
Figure 20
Figure 20
Reliability vs. packets per second.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abiodun A.S., Anisi M.H., Khan M.K. Cloud-based wireless body area networks: Managing data for better health care. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2019;8:55–59. doi: 10.1109/MCE.2019.2892244. - DOI
    1. Chen H., Wang J., Dong X., Zhao C. Security design of ECG telemonitoring systems; Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Application (ICCEA); Guangzhou, China. 18–20 March 2020; pp. 707–711.
    1. Ivanciu I.A., Ivanciu L., Zinca D., Dobrota V. Securing Health-Related Data Transmission Using ECG and Named Data Networks; Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN); Paris, France. 1–3 July 2019; pp. 1–6.
    1. Vishwakarma R., Mohapatra R.K. A secure three-party authentication protocol for wireless body area networks; Proceedings of the 2017 Third International Conference on Sensing, Signal Processing and Security (ICSSS); Chennai, India. 4–5 May 2017; pp. 99–103.
    1. Roy A., Roy C., Misra S., Rahulamathavan Y., Rajarajan M. Care: Criticality-aware data transmission in cps-based healthcare systems; Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops); Kansas City, MO, USA. 20–24 May 2018; pp. 1–6.

LinkOut - more resources