Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;17(3):316-320.
doi: 10.1159/000521967. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

Staging for Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Survey about Adherence to Guidelines in German Breast Centers

Affiliations

Staging for Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Survey about Adherence to Guidelines in German Breast Centers

Marcus Jannes et al. Breast Care (Basel). 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The risk for metastasis at primary diagnosis of breast cancer is about 4%. The German guidelines give clear indications on when, who, and how to stage breast cancer patients. Ideally, this should be done via computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan of the thorax and abdomen and an additional bone scan. But daily practice shows that the way health-care providers handle staging recommendations can vary. To objectify adherence to guidelines we started a nation-wide survey.

Methods: Between July and September 2020, we sent out a survey via email to all certified and noncertified breast centers and in addition to all Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Germany. We asked for timing of staging, conditions that cause staging, and the applied method. In case we did not get any reply, we sent out a reminder.

Results: A total of 220 certified breast centers, 28 noncertified breast centers, and 48 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology who care for breast cancer patients took part in our survey. A general pretherapeutic staging was performed in 16.4%, 39.3%, and 66.7% of all institutions and a general postoperative staging was performed in 4.1%, 0%, and 6.3% of each institutional type, respectively. In terms of the applied method, 75% of all certified breast centers used a CAT scan and bone scan, while 23.3% primarily used chest X-ray, ultrasound of the abdomen (27.7%), or MRI. As a potential reason for using X-ray and ultrasound, the presence of a "low-risk" breast cancer was mentioned.

Summary: Although certified breast centers show the highest adherence to current guidelines, some still perform a general staging or do not use the recommended staging method. The low probability of primary metastatic breast cancer and the use of a reasonable exposure to radiation warrant a critical discussion.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Guidelines; Medical care; Outcome; Staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Robert Koch Institut; Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V . Krebs in Deutschland für 2015/2016. ed 12. Berlin: Robert Koch Institut; 2019.
    1. Ponde NF, Zardavas D, Piccart M. Progress in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;16((1)):27–44. - PubMed
    1. Mittmann N, Porter JM, Rangrej J, Seung SJ, Liu N, Saskin R, et al. Health system costs for stage-specific breast cancer: a population-based approach. Curr Oncol. 2014 Dec;21((6)):281–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie für die Früherkennung, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. Langversion 4.1, September 2018. AWMF-Registernummer: 032-045OL
    1. Ditsch N, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Friedrich M, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, et al. AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early breast cancer: Update 2021. Breast Care (Basel) 2021 Jun;16((3)):214–27. - PMC - PubMed