Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 26:9:865664.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.865664. eCollection 2022.

A review of argasid ticks and associated pathogens of China

Affiliations
Review

A review of argasid ticks and associated pathogens of China

Ze Chen et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

It has been recorded 221 species of soft ticks in the world. However, the classification system of Argasidae is still unclear with nearly two-third controversial species in genus level. Therefore, comprehensive research is still necessary. In 2016, Wen and Chen overviewed the valid species of soft ticks in China for the first time. Up to now, the soft tick fauna of China remains poorly known. Although several studies have been undertaken, the information regarding soft ticks and associated diseases are fragmentary. To facilitate the future study of this group, the scattered information on soft ticks of China is herein synthesized. Toward the end of 2021, 15 valid species of argasid ticks have been reported, of these, 9 species (60%) including Argas beijingensis, A. japonicus, A. persicus, A. sinensis, A. vespertilionis, A. vulgaris, Ornithodoros lahorensis, O. tartakovskyi, and O. papillipes have been recorded biting humans. Argas persicus is the most common species, and its borne pathogens are widely investigated, while most other argasid ticks are not sufficiently studied in China. Here, we summarize detailed information regarding hosts, geographical distribution, molecular data, and vector roles of argasid ticks in China.

Keywords: Argasidae; China; host and distribution; molecular characters; tick-borne pathogens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen Z, Liu J. Recent progress in tick taxonomy and a global list of tick species. Chin J Appl Entomol. (2020) 57:1009–45. 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2020.104 - DOI
    1. Peñalver E, Arillo A, Delclòs X, Peris D, Grimaldi DA, Anderson S, et al. . Ticks parasitised feathered dinosaurs as revealed by Cretaceous amber assemblages. Nat Commun. (2017) 8:1924. 10.1038/s41467-017-01550-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG, Apanaskevich DA, Petney TN, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG. The argasidae, ixodidae and nuttalliellidae (Acari: Ixodida) of the world: a list of valid species names. Zootaxa. (2010) 2528:1–28. 10.11646/zootaxa.2528.1.1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clifford CM, Kohls GM, Sonenshine DE. The systematics of the subfamily ornithodorinae (Acarina: Argasidae). I. The genera and subgenera. Ann Entomol Soc Am. (1964) 57:429–37. 10.1093/aesa/57.4.429 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoogstraal H. Argasid and nuttalliellid ticks as parasites and vectors. Adv Parasit. (1985) 24:135–238. 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60563-1 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources