Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):4606-4616.
eCollection 2022.

A four-miRNA signature in serum as a biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis

Affiliations

A four-miRNA signature in serum as a biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis

Rongkang Li et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Background: Urinary bladder cancer (BCa) is globally the 10th most frequent cancer. As a novel diagnostic tool, miRNA in serum screening is non-invasive. This project aimed to determine particular serum miRNAs as novel biomarkers for diagnosing urinary BCa.

Methods: We designed a three-phase study with 122 healthy controls (HCs) and 132 BCa patients. The 30 miRNAs' expressions in serum from HCs and BCa patients were detected during the screening phase. The miRNAs with the most dysregulation were tested in the training (HCs vs. BCa, 30 each) and validation (80 HCs vs. 82 BCa) phase further. The diagnostic ability of these candidate miRNAs was estimated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves as well as the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The miRNAs' target genes and their annotations to functions were predicted utilizing bioinformatic assays.

Results: Six serum miRNAs (miR-124-3p, miR-182-5p, miR-1-3p, miR-196a-5p, miR-23b-3p and miR-34a-5p) had significantly different expression between BCa patients and HCs in the training and validation phase. The four-microRNA panel improved the diagnostic value, with AUC =0.985. The result of bioinformatic analysis showed that these miRNAs' target genes in the panel may be related to the MAPK signaling pathway in bladder cancer.

Conclusions: Our study identified a four-miRNA panel that is a non-invasive new biomarker for diagnosing BCa.

Keywords: Bladder cancer; bioinformatics; biomarker; diagnosis; miRNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design overview. Study design overview. HCs: healthy controls; BCa: bladder cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heatmap of the 30 miRNAs during the screening phase. During the screening phase, 30 miRNAs’ expressions are shown in the heatmap. 12 candidate miRNAs were chosen for further study with 1.5 FC and P<0.05. The red means up-regulated and the blue means down-regulated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The 12 candidate miRNAs’ expression during the training phase. The 12 candidate miRNAs’ expression during the training phase with 30 BCa patients and 30 HCs. *represents P<0.05, **represents P<0.01, ***represents P<0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The expression and ROC curve analyses of six candidate miRNAs in the validation phase. In this phase, 82 BCa patients’ and 80 HCs’ serum were involved. The relative expression level of (A) miR-1-3p, (C) miR-23b-3p, (E) miR-34a-5p and (G) miR-124-3p were remarkably downregulated in BCa patients’ serum. (I) miR-182-5p and (K) miR-196a-5p were significantly upregulated. The AUC were (B) 0.682 for miR-1-3p with 95% CI: 0.604 to 0.753, (D) 0.748 for miR-23b-3p with 95% CI: 0.674 to 0.813, (F) 0.804 for miR-34a-5p with 95% CI: 0.734 to 0.862, (H) 0.688 for miR-124-3p with 95% CI: 0.611 to 0.758, (J) 0.867 for miR-182-5p 95% CI: 0.805 to 0.915 and (L) 0.731 for miR-196a-5p with 95% CI: 0.656 to 0.757. *represents P<0.05, **represents P<0.01, ***represents P<0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Four-miRNA panel’s ROC curve analyses. The four-miRNA panel’s AUC (miR-182-5p, miR-196a-5p, miR-124-3p and miR-34a-5p) was 0.985 (95% CI: 0.952 to 0.998; sensitivity =98.78%, specificity =93.75%).
Figure 6
Figure 6
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and GO annotation of the target genes of miR-182-5p, miR-196a-5p, miR-124-3p and miR-34a-5p. A. Biological process analysis; B. Cellular component analysis; C. Molecular function analysis; D. KEGG analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Laaksonen MA, MacInnis RJ, Canfell K, Giles GG, Hull P, Shaw JE, Cumming RG, Gill TK, Banks E, Mitchell P, Byles JE, Magliano DJ, Hirani V, Connah D, Vajdic CM. The future burden of kidney and bladder cancers preventable by behavior modification in Australia: a pooled cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:874–883. - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34. - PubMed
    1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, Jemal A, Kramer JL, Siegel RL. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:363–385. - PubMed
    1. Sanli O, Dobruch J, Knowles MA, Burger M, Alemozaffar M, Nielsen ME, Lotan Y. Bladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17022. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources