Diagnostic and prognostic utility of eIF6 in glioblastoma: a study based on TCGA and CGGA databases
- PMID: 35958479
- PMCID: PMC9360856
Diagnostic and prognostic utility of eIF6 in glioblastoma: a study based on TCGA and CGGA databases
Abstract
Background: Among various glioma types, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of those with the highest malignancy. Although overexpression of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 (eIF6), a factor that regulates protein translation initiation, is believed to promote tumor development, its function and potential molecular mechanisms in glioma progression remain uncharacterized. Consequently, we evaluated its diagnostic and prognostic utility in GBM patients.
Methods: Sample data from two databases, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA), were utilized to investigate the role of eIF6 as well as its mechanism of action in gliomas. We analyzed eIF6 expression in normal tissues as well as cancerous samples of different stages of glioma. The diagnostic and prognostic value of eIF6 were analyzed using the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) and Kaplan-Meier analysis, respectively. Furthermore, its underlying molecular mechanism in GBM was further revealed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA).
Results: Transcriptome data analyses of the two databases showed that eIF6 was upregulated in glioma tissues compared with normal counterparts. eIF6 was at high levels in WHO grade IV gliomas versus grade II and III gliomas (P<0.05). In addition, eIF6 was highly expressed in elderly and Asian glioma patients. Furthermore, eIF6 expression was found to be lower in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated tumors. Patients with high eIF6 level presented shorter overall survival than cases with low eIF6 level (P<0.05), and eIF6 had favorable accuracy in predicting the prognosis of glioma patients. GSEA revealed that high eIF6 expression was mainly concentrated in cell cycle and DNA repair related pathways.
Conclusions: eIF6 is highly expressed in gliomas and positively associated with the degree of malignancy. Patients with high eIF6 expression present poor survival. Therefore, eIF6 has the potential to be a diagnostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for glioma development and GBM.
Keywords: GSEA; eIF6; glioma; overall survival.
AJTR Copyright © 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Prognostic value of CTF1 in glioma and its role in the tumor microenvironment.Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 31;13(12):6862-6879. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1258. Epub 2024 Dec 27. Transl Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 39816535 Free PMC article.
-
CKS2 (CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 2) is a prognostic biomarker in lower grade glioma: a study based on bioinformatic analysis and immunohistochemistry.Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(1):5996-6009. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1972197. Bioengineered. 2021. PMID: 34494924 Free PMC article.
-
A Prognostic Microenvironment-Related Immune Signature via ESTIMATE (PROMISE Model) Predicts Overall Survival of Patients With Glioma.Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 7;10:580263. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.580263. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33425732 Free PMC article.
-
Systematically profiling the expression of eIF3 subunits in glioma reveals the expression of eIF3i has prognostic value in IDH-mutant lower grade glioma.Cancer Cell Int. 2019 Jun 4;19:155. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0867-1. eCollection 2019. Cancer Cell Int. 2019. PMID: 31171919 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic significance of CDKN2A homozygous deletion in IDH-mutant lower-grade glioma and glioblastoma: a systematic review of the contemporary literature.J Neurooncol. 2020 Jun;148(2):221-229. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03528-2. Epub 2020 May 8. J Neurooncol. 2020. PMID: 32385699
Cited by
-
Exploiting Translation Machinery for Cancer Therapy: Translation Factors as Promising Targets.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 9;25(19):10835. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910835. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39409166 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multi-omic analyses of m5C readers reveal their characteristics and immunotherapeutic proficiency.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52110-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38238581 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Omuro A, DeAngelis LM. Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310:1842–1850. - PubMed
-
- Wang M, Kuang R, Huang B, Ji D. Polylactic acid block copolymer grafted temozolomide targeted nano delivery in the treatment of glioma. Mater Express. 2021;11:627–633.
-
- Chen C, Fan R, Wang Y, Wang L, Huang C, Zhou L, Xu J, Chen H, Guo G. Hyaluronic acid-conjugated nanoparticles for the targeted delivery of cabazitaxel to CD44-overexpressing glioblastoma cells. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2021;17:595–605. - PubMed
-
- Bush NA, Chang SM, Berger MS. Current and future strategies for treatment of glioma. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40:1–14. - PubMed
-
- Perry A, Wesseling P. Histologic classification of gliomas. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;134:71–95. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources