Biomechanical effect of Coflex and X-STOP spacers on the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis
- PMID: 35958508
- PMCID: PMC9360861
Biomechanical effect of Coflex and X-STOP spacers on the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis
Abstract
Objective: To explore the biomechanical differences between Coflex and X-STOP devices by finite element analysis.
Methods: Based on the normal lumbar CT images from a healthy adult volunteer, four finite element models including the healthy lumbar segment model, the mild degenerated lumbar segment model, a Coflex fixed lumbar segment model and X-STOP fixed lumbar segment model were constructed. A simulation analysis under the conditions of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation was performed to compare range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, the facet joint force, the maximum Von Mises stress and the peak facet contact forces, between Coflex and X-STOP devices.
Results: Compared to the mild degenerated lumbar segment model at surgical level L4-L5, Coflex and X-STOP could reduce ROM in extension by 98.34% and 95.86%, respectively, decrease peak stress of intervertebral discs in extension by 59.4% and 66.17%, respectively, and release peak force of facet joint in extension by 97.09% and 95.42%, respectively. Both devices had no significant impact on adjacent levels. The maximum Von Mises stress in Coflex device was 637.56 Mpa in flexion, 528.86 Mpa in extension, while the maximum Von Mises stress in X-STOP device was 476.65 Mpa at extension position. The peak facet contact forces of Coflex and X-STOP devices appeared in extension and were 19.76 Mpa and 49.28 Mpa, respectively.
Conclusions: Coflex and X-STOP devices can effectively decrease the ROM and intradiscal pressure in extension, without affecting the adjacent levels.
Keywords: Coflex; X-STOP; biomechanical properties; finite element analysis; lumbar vertebrae.
AJTR Copyright © 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical Effect of L4 -L5 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study.Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):917-930. doi: 10.1111/os.12703. Epub 2020 May 31. Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 32476282 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 17;23(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05543-y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 35715775 Free PMC article.
-
Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a finite element analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 30;14(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1503-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31888664 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing isolated degeneration of lumbar facet joints: implications for degenerative instability and lumbar biomechanics using finite element analysis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 27;12:1294658. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1294658. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 38600941 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty of Different Facet Joint Portions on Lumbar Biomechanics: A Finite Element Analysis.Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1277-1284. doi: 10.1111/os.12740. Epub 2020 Jul 8. Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 32643308 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluating 5-year outcomes of interlaminar devices as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.Eur Spine J. 2023 Apr;32(4):1367-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07610-x. Epub 2023 Feb 25. Eur Spine J. 2023. PMID: 36840820
-
One-hole split endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and complications.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 21;20(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05591-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 39985036 Free PMC article.
-
Five-year radiological outcomes between decompression alone and decompression with an interlaminar device for lumbar spinal stenosis.J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):488-500. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-33. Epub 2024 Sep 9. J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39399083 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical characteristics of a novel interspinous distraction fusion device in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a finite element analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Dec 6;24(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07066-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 38057738 Free PMC article.
-
Coflex Interspinous Stabilization with Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Average 14-Year Follow-Up.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 21;14(8):2856. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082856. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40283686 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chu PL, Wang T, Zheng JL, Xu CQ, Yan YJ, Ma QS, Meng-Chen Y, Da-Sheng T. Global and current research trends of unilateral biportal endoscopy/biportal endoscopic spinal surgery in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a bibliometric and visualization study. Orthop Surg. 2022;14:635–643. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources