Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 25:13:945288.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.945288. eCollection 2022.

Pretransplant characteristics of kidney transplant recipients that predict posttransplant outcome

Affiliations
Review

Pretransplant characteristics of kidney transplant recipients that predict posttransplant outcome

Martin Tepel et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Better characterization of the potential kidney transplant recipient using novel biomarkers, for example, pretransplant plasma endotrophin, will lead to improved outcome after transplantation. This mini-review will focus on current knowledge about pretransplant recipients' characteristics, biomarkers, and immunology. Clinical characteristics of recipients including age, obesity, blood pressure, comorbidities, and estimated survival scores have been introduced for prediction of recipient and allograft survival. The pretransplant immunologic risk assessment include histocompatibility leukocyte antigens (HLAs), anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies, HLA-DQ mismatch, and non-HLA antibodies. Recently, there has been the hope that pretransplant determination of markers can further improve the prediction of posttransplant complications, both short-term and long-term outcomes including rejections, allograft loss, and mortality. Higher pretransplant plasma endotrophin levels were independently associated with posttransplant acute allograft injury in three prospective European cohorts. Elevated numbers of non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism mismatch have been associated with increased allograft loss in a multivariable analysis. It is concluded that there is a need for integration of clinical characteristics and novel molecular and immunological markers to improve future transplant medicine to reach better diagnostic decisions tailored to the individual patient.

Keywords: acute allograft injury; biomarker; endotrophin; immunology; kidney transplantation; potential kidney transplant recipient; precision transplant medicine; rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MAK, FG, and DGKR are full-time employees at Nordic Bioscience. Nordic Bioscience is a privately-owned, small–medium size enterprise partly focused on the development of biomarkers. None of the authors received fees, bonuses or other benefits for the work described in the review. MAK, FG, and DGKR hold stocks in Nordic Bioscience. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps toward the future integration of a predictive biomarker to evaluate potential kidney transplant recipients. A simplified scheme for investigations required to improve future transplant medicine and to reach precision medicine is shown. Outcome may indicate a large spectrum of paraclinical or clinical endpoints, for example (but not limited to), glomerular filtration rate, loss of allograft, infections, hypertension, immunosuppression, acute allograft injury, rejection episodes, or patient-reported outcome measures. Examples for outcome variables’ timing (years) are shown but may be adopted according to appropriate study plans. Tx indicates transplantation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Danovitch GM. ed. Handbook of kidney transplantation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; (2005).
    1. Wu WK, Famure O, Li Y, Kim SJ. Delayed graft function and the risk of acute rejection in the modern era of kidney transplantation. Kidney Int (2015) 88:851–8. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.190 - DOI - PubMed
    1. El-Husseini A, Aghil A, Ramirez J, Sawaya B, Rajagopalan N, Baz M, et al. . Outcome of kidney transplant in primary, repeat, and kidney-after-nonrenal solid-organ transplantation: 15-year analysis of recent UNOS database. Clin Transplant (2017) 31. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13108 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raynaud M, Aubert O, Divard G, Reese PP, Kamar J, Yoo D, et al. . Dynamic prediction of renal survival among deeply phenotyped kidney transplant recipients using artificial intelligence: an observational, international, multicohort study. Lancet Digit Health (2021) 3:e795–805. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00209-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan B, Schold J, Meier-Kriesche HU. Poor predictive value of serum creatinine for renal allograft loss. Am J Transplant (2003) 3:1560–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00275.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types