Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 1:2022:8720412.
doi: 10.1155/2022/8720412. eCollection 2022.

Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew

Affiliations
Review

Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew

Van Mai Truong et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Miniscrew has been used widely as an effective orthodontic anchorage with reliable stationary quality, ease of insertion and removal techniques, immediate or early loading, flexibility in site insertion, less trauma, minimal patient cooperation, and lower price. Nonetheless, it is not free of complications, and they could impact not only the miniscrew success rate but also patients' oral health. In this article, literature was searched and reviewed electronically as well as manually to evaluate the complications of orthodontic miniscrew. The selected articles are analyzed and subcategorized into complications during and after insertion, under loading, and during and after removal along with treatment if needed according to the time. In addition, the noteworthy associated factors such as the insertion and removal procedures, characteristics of both regional and local anatomic structures, and features of the miniscrew itself that play a significant role in the performance of miniscrews are also discussed based on literature evidence. Clinicians should notice these complications and their related factors to make a proper treatment plan with better outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflict of interest for this work.

References

    1. Zheng X., Sun Y., Zhang Y., Cai T., Sun F., Lin J. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: an overview. Medicine . 2018;97(13, article e0232) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010232. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jasoria G., Shamim W., Rathore S., Kalra A., Manchanda M., Jaggi N. Miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice . 2013;14(5):993–999. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1439. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brettin B. T., Grosland N. M., Qian F., et al. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2008;134(5):625–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohammed H., Wafaie K., Rizk M. Z., Almuzian M., Sosly R., Bearn D. R. Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Progress in Orthodontics . 2018;19(1):p. 36. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0225-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramirez-Ossa D. M., Escobar-Correa N., Ramirez-Bustamante M. A., Agudelo-Suarez A. A. An umbrella review of the effectiveness of temporary anchorage devices and the factors that contribute to their success or failure. The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice . 2020;20(2):p. 101402. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101402. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources