Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 26:10:893831.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893831. eCollection 2022.

Geophagia: Benefits and potential toxicity to human-A review

Affiliations
Review

Geophagia: Benefits and potential toxicity to human-A review

Julius Nsawir Bonglaisin et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Geophagy is the habit of consuming clay soil such as chalk or kaolin. Though it is globally practiced, the safety of those involved is yet to be fully established. It is thought to be highly prevalent in pregnant women because of its antinausea or therapeutic effects. This practice is also thought to be provoked by some nutritional needs, but in modern society its etiology is obscure. The mineralogical and chemical compositions of clay may vary from one region to another and even in all form of rocks clay constitutes. Published articles in geophagy indicate lack of adequate investigations into the toxicity of geophagy, though it is globally practiced and more prevalent in Africa (as a continent) or in Africans migrants. Some studies have helped to identify some minerals that are toxic to human if ingested. In most cases, the potential toxicity emphasized by these studies is based on the detection of the presence of these nuisance elements in the geophagic materials. Scientifically, a lot has been done in the light of detection of toxic matter, but more investigations on metabolic studies are still necessary. The variability of clay content with respect to source motivated this review on geophagy and its potential toxicity to human. This review is aimed at bringing out findings that would enable a better understanding of the toxicity potential of geophagy across context and taxa.

Keywords: clay; geophagy; prevalence; review; toxicity potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The bases of toxicity of geophagic material in reviewed papers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Goiter illustration by the Centre for Disease Control (CDC), USA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ijeoma KH, Onyoche OE, Uju OV, Chukwuene IF. Assessment of heavy metals in edible clays sold in Onitsha Metropolis of Anambra State, Nigeria. British J Appl Sci Tech. (2014) 4:2114–24. 10.9734/BJAST/2014/7946 - DOI
    1. Campbell H. Calabash Chalk (calabar stone, la craie, argile, nzu, mabele). Belfast: Department of Health, Social Service and Public Safety; (2002).
    1. Saathoff E, Olsen A, Kvalsvig JD, Geissler PW. Geophagy and its association with geohelminth infection in rural schoolchildren from northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. (2002) 96:485–90. 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90413-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geissler PW, Mwaniki DL. Thiong'o F, Michaelsen, KF, Friis H. Geophagy, iron status and anaemia among primary school children in Western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. (1998) 3:529–34. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00272.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mashao U, Ekosse G, Odiyo J, Bukalo N. Geophagic practice in Mashau Village, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Heliyon. (2021) 7:e06497. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06497 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources