Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 26:13:900600.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900600. eCollection 2022.

Logometro®: The psychometric properties of a norm-referenced digital battery for language assessment of Greek-speaking 4-7 years old children

Affiliations

Logometro®: The psychometric properties of a norm-referenced digital battery for language assessment of Greek-speaking 4-7 years old children

Faye Antoniou et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

In educational and clinical settings, few norm-referenced tests have been utilized until now usually focusing on a single or a few language subcomponents, along with very few language rating scales for parents and educators. The need for a comprehensive language assessment tool for preschool and early school years children which could form the basis for valid and reliable screening and diagnostic decisions, led to the development of a new norm-referenced digital tool called Logometro®. The aim of the present study is to describe Logometro® as well as its psychometric characteristics. Logometro® evaluates an array of oral language skills across the different language domains such as phonological awareness, listening comprehension, vocabulary knowledge (receptive and expressive), narrative speech, morphological awareness, pragmatics, as well emergent literacy skills (letter sound knowledge and invented writing) in Greek-speaking 4-7 years old children. More specifically, Logometro® has been designed in order to: (a) map individual language development paths as well as difficulties, (b) provide a descriptive profile of children's oral language and emergent literacy skills, and (c) assist in the identification of children who are at risk for Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) or Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD). The sample consisted of 926 children aged from 4 to 7 years, which were recruited from diverse geographical provinces and represented a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds in Greece. Eight hundred participants were typically developing children (N boys = 384 and N girls = 416), 126 children (N SLI = 44 and N SLD = 82) represented children with Special Educational Needs, and 126 children were typically developing peers matched for gender and age with the clinical groups. The administration lasted 90 min, depending on the participant's age and competence. Validity (construct, criterion, convergent, discriminant, and predictive) as well as internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed. Results indicated that Logometro® is characterized by good psychometric properties and can constitute a norm-referenced battery of oral language and emergent literacy skills. It could be used to inform the professionals as well as the researchers about a child's language strengths and weaknesses and form the basis on which they can design an appropriate individualized intervention if needed.

Keywords: developmental language disorder; digital assessment tool; emergent literacy skills; oral language; screening; specific learning disabilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The preschool measures reported here form part of a commercially available screening battery (Logometro, produced by InteLearn Multimedia Educational Applications) designed by the authors, who receive part of the proceeds from its use.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final model for the measurement of oral language skills (Logometro) reflecting four intercorrelated latent constructs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Developmental trajectories of the four domains of the Logometro for the different age groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bishop D. V., Snowling M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychol. Bull. 130:858. - PubMed
    1. Bishop D. V., McDonald D., Bird S., Hayiou-Thomas M. E. (2009). Children who read words accurately despite language impairment: who are they and how do they do it? Child Dev. 80, 593–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01281.x, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop D. V., Snowling M. J., Thompson P. A., Greenhalgh T., CATALISE Consortium (2016). CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children. PLoS One 11:e0158753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158753 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop D. V., Snowling M. J., Thompson P. A., Greenhalgh T., Catalise-2 Consortium. Adams C., et al. . (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: terminology. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 58, 1068–1080. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12721 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley L., Bryant P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read:a causal connection. Nature 301, 419–421. doi: 10.1038/301419a0 - DOI