Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep;39(3):485-497.
doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.107024. Epub 2021 Jul 3.

Effects of unilateral vs. bilateral resistance training interventions on measures of strength, jump, linear and change of direction speed: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Effects of unilateral vs. bilateral resistance training interventions on measures of strength, jump, linear and change of direction speed: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kai-Fang Liao et al. Biol Sport. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Exercises can be categorized into either unilateral or bilateral movements. Despite the topic popularity, the answer to the question as to which (unilateral or bilateral) is superior for a certain athletic performance enhancement remains unclear. To compare the effect of unilateral and bilateral resistance training interventions on measures of athletic performance. Keywords related with unilateral, bilateral and performance were used to search in the Web of Science, PubMed databases, and Google Scholar and ResearchGate™ websites. 6365 articles were initially identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis, with overall article quality being deemed moderate. The quantitative analysis comprised 392 subjects (aged: 16 to 26 years). Sub-group analysis showed that unilateral exercise resistance training resulted in a large effect in improving unilateral jump performance compared to bilateral training (ES = 0.89 [0.52, 1.26]). In contrast, bilateral exercise resistance training showed a small effect in improving bilateral strength compared to unilateral (ES = -0.43 [-0.71, -0.14]). Non-significant differences were found in improving unilateral strength (ES = 0.26 [-0.03, 0.55]), bilateral jump performance (ES = -0.04 [-0.31, 0.23]), change of direction (COD) (ES = 0.31 [-0.01, 0.63]) and speed (ES = -0.12 [-0.46, 0.21]) performance. Unilateral resistance training exercises should be chosen for improving unilateral jumping performance, and bilateral resistance training exercises should be chosen for improving bilateral strength performance.

Keywords: Bilateral exercises; Exercise selection; Performance; Unilateral exercises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Flow chart illustrating the different phases of the search and study selection
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Forest plot comparing the effects of bilateral and unilateral exercises training on athletic performance. Bul s: Bulgaria split squat; LP: leg press; ISO:isokinetic; MP:Maximum power; KE: knee extension; U: unilateral; B:bilateral; L: left; R: right; CMJ: countermovement jump; SJ: squat jump; Tmod: T modified test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGuigan, M.R., G.A. Wright, and S.J. Fleck. Strength training for athletes: does it really help sports performance? Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2012. 7(1): 2–5. - PubMed
    1. Suchomel, T.J., S. Nimphius, and M.H. Stone. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Med, 2016. 46(10): 1419–1449. - PubMed
    1. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Flanagan SD, Shurley JP, Todd JS, Todd TC. Understanding the science of resistance training: an evolutionary perspective. Sports Med, 2017. 47(12): 2415–2435. - PubMed
    1. Siff, M. and YJ. Verkhoshansky, Super training: Strength training for sporting excellence. 1998, Denver, CO: Pittsburgh: Sports Support Syndicate.
    1. Young, WB. Transfer of strength and power training to sports performance. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2006. 1(2): 74–83. - PubMed