Personalized medicine with drugs targeting the underlying protein defect in cystic fibrosis: is monitoring of treatment response necessary?
- PMID: 35959505
- PMCID: PMC9358561
- DOI: 10.1177/20406223221108627
Personalized medicine with drugs targeting the underlying protein defect in cystic fibrosis: is monitoring of treatment response necessary?
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by two mutations in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. In the last years, drugs targeting the underlying protein defect like lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA) and more recently elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) were admitted. Outcome parameters evaluating therapy response like forced expiratory pressure in 1 s (FEV1), body mass index (BMI) or the efficacy of CFTR function in sweat glands showed improvement in several cases. Other, CFTR biomarkers were analysed rarely. This prospective observational study was aimed at evaluating CFTR function in patients treated with different CFTR modulators together with common valid clinical outcome parameters at standardized appointments (day 0, week 2, 4, 16). We followed four patients with the same mutation (F508del-CFTR), sex, age and disease severity. Monitoring focused on lung function, gastrointestinal aspects and CFTR function of sweat glands, nasal and intestinal epithelium. Sweat tests were performed by pilocarpine iontophoresis. Nasal potential difference (NPD) measured transepithelial voltage in vivo and potential increased when CFTR function improved. Rectal biopsies were obtained for intestinal current measurements (ICM) ex vivo. Intestinal CFTR function was assessed by stimulating chloride secretion with different reagents. Response to CFTR modulators regarding clinical outcome parameters was rather variable. A sweat chloride reduction of 35.3 mmol/L, nasal CFTR rescue of 4.4% and fivefold higher CFTR function in the intestine was seen at week 16 post-LUM/IVA. Due to our monitoring, we identified a non-responder to LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA. In case of ELX/TEZ/IVA, clinical parameters and CFTR bioassays improved and were concordant. Although our cohort is small, results emphasize that non-responders exist and conclusions could not be drawn if patients were not monitored. Data on CFTR function can confirm or disprove ongoing CFTR dysfunction and might be helpful selectively. Non-responders need other alternative therapy options as demonstrated with ELX/TEZ/IVA.
Keywords: CFTR modulator therapy; cystic fibrosis; drug reactions; intestinal current measurements; nasal potential difference.
© The Author(s), 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: K.N. reports support for attending meetings and/or travel by Chiesi Pharmaceuticals GmbH and TEVA-Ratiopharm Arzneimittel Vertriebs-GmbH, outside the submitted work. V.G. and C.R.-N. have nothing to disclose. D.A. reports support for attending meetings and/or travel by Mylan Austria GmbH, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and TEVA-Ratiopharm Arzneimittel Vertriebs-GmbH, outside the submitted work. J.E. reports support for attending meetings and/or travel by Corbus Pharmaceuticals GmbH and Chiesi Pharmaceuticals GmbH. T.F. reports support for attending meetings and/or travel by Mylan Austria GmbH and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. L.N. reports grants or contracts from German Center for Lung Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim (for study participation), outside the submitted work. Furthermore, he is a member of the trial steering committee for CF STORM, the medical leader of the German CF registry as well as the manager of the pharmacovigilance study of the ECFS and editorial supporter of Articulate Science LLC. H.E. reports grants or contracts with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (for study participation), outside the submitted work. Furthermore, he received personal support for presentations and for advisory board by Vertex Pharmaceuticals as well as by TEVA-Ratiopharm Arzneimittel Vertriebs-GmbH and Chiesi Pharmaceuticals support for attending meetings.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Therapy on CFTR Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and One or Two F508del Alleles.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;205(5):540-549. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202110-2249OC. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 34936849
-
Progress of personalized medicine of cystic fibrosis in the times of efficient CFTR modulators.Mol Cell Pediatr. 2025 May 5;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40348-025-00194-0. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40320452 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children 6 Through 11 Years of Age with Cystic Fibrosis Heterozygous for F508del and a Minimal Function Mutation: A Phase 3b, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;206(11):1361-1369. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0392OC. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35816621 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Longitudinal profiling of the intestinal microbiome in children with cystic fibrosis treated with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor.mBio. 2024 Feb 14;15(2):e0193523. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01935-23. Epub 2024 Jan 26. mBio. 2024. PMID: 38275294 Free PMC article.
-
Corrector therapies (with or without potentiators) for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):CD010966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010966.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11:CD010966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010966.pub4. PMID: 33331662 Free PMC article. Updated.
Cited by
-
CFTR modulators response of S737F and T465N CFTR variants on patient-derived rectal organoids.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Sep 13;19(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03334-3. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024. PMID: 39272186 Free PMC article.
-
Current and Future Therapeutic Approaches of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency in Children with Cystic Fibrosis in the Era of Personalized Medicine.Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 3;15(1):162. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010162. Pharmaceutics. 2023. PMID: 36678791 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Donaldson SH, Boucher RC. Die Pathophysiologie der Mukoviszidose. Ann Nestlé [Ger] 2006; 64: 103–111.
-
- Kunzelmann K. CFTR: interacting with everything. News Physiol Sci 2001; 16: 167–170. - PubMed
-
- Rogan MP, Stoltz DA, Hornick DB. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator intracellular processing, trafficking, and opportunities for mutation-specific treatment. Chest 2011; 139: 1480–1490. - PubMed
-
- Terlizzi V, Claut L, Tosco A, et al.. A survey of the prevalence, management and outcome of infants with an inconclusive diagnosis following newborn bloodspot screening for cystic fibrosis (CRMS / CFSPID) in six Italian centres. J Cyst Fibros 2021; 20: 828–834. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous