Antimicrobial stewardship for sepsis in the intensive care unit: Survey of critical care and infectious diseases physicians
- PMID: 35959529
- PMCID: PMC9588438
- DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.389
Antimicrobial stewardship for sepsis in the intensive care unit: Survey of critical care and infectious diseases physicians
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the attitudes of infectious diseases (ID) and critical care physicians toward antimicrobial stewardship in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Design: Anonymous, cross-sectional, web-based surveys.
Setting: Surveys were completed in March-November 2017, and data were analyzed from December 2017 to December 2019.
Participants: ID and critical care fellows and attending physicians.
Methods: We included 10 demographic and 17 newly developed, 5-point, Likert-scaled items measuring attitudes toward ICU antimicrobial stewardship and transdisciplinary collaboration. Exploratory principal components analysis (PCA) was used for data reduction. Multivariable linear regression models explored demographic and attitudinal variables.
Results: Of 372 respondents, 315 physicians had complete data (72% attendings, 28% fellows; 63% ID specialists, and 37% critical care specialists). Our PCA yielded a 3-item factor measuring which specialty should assume ICU antimicrobial stewardship (Cronbach standardized α = 0.71; higher scores indicate that ID physicians should be stewards), and a 4-item factor measuring value of ICU transdisciplinary collaborations (α = 0.62; higher scores indicate higher value). In regression models, ID physicians (vs critical care physicians), placed higher value on ICU collaborations and expressed discomfort with uncertain diagnoses. These factors were independently associated with stronger agreement that ID physicians should be ICU antimicrobial stewards. The following factors were independently associated with higher value of transdisciplinary collaboration: female sex, less discomfort with uncertain diagnoses, and stronger agreement with ID physicians as ICU antimicrobial stewards.
Conclusions: ID and critical care physicians endorsed their own group for antimicrobial stewardship, but both groups placed high value on ICU transdisciplinary collaborations. Physicians who were more uncomfortable with uncertain diagnoses reported preference for ID physicians to coordinate ICU antimicrobial stewardship; however, physicians who were less uncomfortable with uncertain diagnoses placed greater value on ICU collaborations.
Similar articles
-
Intensivists' perceptions and attitudes towards infectious diseases management in the ICU: An international survey.Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2022 Oct;46(10):549-558. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2021.06.007. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2022. PMID: 36155678
-
A National Survey of Critical Care Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):61-5. doi: 10.1177/0885066614541922. Epub 2014 Jul 8. J Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID: 25005699
-
Performance of infectious diseases specialists, hospitalists, and other internal medicine physicians in antimicrobial case-based scenarios: Potential impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs at 16 Veterans' Affairs medical centers.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):400-405. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.100. Epub 2022 May 4. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 35506398 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial Stewardship in the ICU.Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;43(1):131-140. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740977. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35172363 Review.
-
Antimicrobial Stewardship Approaches in the Intensive Care Unit.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Sep;31(3):513-534. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28687210 Review.
Cited by
-
Barriers and facilitators to optimal sepsis care - a systematized review of healthcare professionals' perspectives.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12777-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40275226 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Infection Prevention and Control Strategies According to the Type of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Candida auris in Intensive Care Units: A Pragmatic Resume including Pathogens R0 and a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;13(8):789. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080789. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39200090 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Policy statement on antimicrobial stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:322–327. - PubMed
-
- Kaki R, Elligsen M, Walker S, Simor A, Palmay L, Daneman N. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship in critical care: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:1223–1230. - PubMed
-
- Chou AF, Graber CJ, Jones M, et al. Characteristics of antimicrobial stewardship programs at Veterans’ Affairs hospitals: results of a nationwide survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:647–654. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical