Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Feb;72(2):475-491.
doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03253-x. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail in pretreated patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical or endometrial carcinoma: Results of the phase II PRIMMO study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail in pretreated patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical or endometrial carcinoma: Results of the phase II PRIMMO study

Emiel A De Jaeghere et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

A phase II study (PRIMMO) of patients with pretreated persistent/recurrent/metastatic cervical or endometrial cancer is presented. Patients received an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail (IDC) consisting of low-dose cyclophosphamide, aspirin, lansoprazole, vitamin D, and curcumin starting 2 weeks before radioimmunotherapy. Pembrolizumab was administered three-weekly from day 15 onwards; one of the tumor lesions was irradiated (8Gyx3) on days 15, 17, and 19. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate per immune-related response criteria (irORR) at week 26 (a lower bound of the 90% confidence interval [CI] of > 10% was considered efficacious). The prespecified 43 patients (cervical, n = 18; endometrial, n = 25) were enrolled. The irORR was 11.1% (90% CI 2.0-31.0) in cervical cancer and 12.0% (90% CI 3.4-28.2) in endometrial cancer. Median duration of response was not reached in both cohorts. Median interval-censored progression-free survival was 4.1 weeks (95% CI 4.1-25.7) in cervical cancer and 3.6 weeks (95% CI 3.6-15.4) in endometrial cancer; median overall survival was 39.6 weeks (95% CI 15.0-67.0) and 37.4 weeks (95% CI 19.0-50.3), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 10 (55.6%) cervical cancer patients and 9 (36.0%) endometrial cancer patients. Health-related quality of life was generally stable over time. Responders had a significantly higher proportion of peripheral T cells when compared to nonresponders (p = 0.013). In conclusion, PRIMMO did not meet its primary objective in both cohorts; pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an IDC had modest but durable antitumor activity with acceptable but not negligible toxicity.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03192059) and EudraCT Registry (number 2016-001569-97).

Keywords: Drug therapy, combination; Gynecologic neoplasms; Immunomodulation; Radioimmunotherapy; Tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EAD: travel and accommodation expenses (institutional, not personal) from AstraZeneca, GSK, Pfizer, and PharmaMar. AMTV: became an employee for GSK during the publication development. PV: consulting or advisory role (personal) from Eli Lily and Company, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; research funding from Tesaro. SH: consulting or advisory role (personal) from AstraZeneca, BMSi, Gilead Sciences, Merck, MSD Oncology, Novartis, and Sanofi. SA: consulting or advisory role (institutional, not personal) for MSD, Sanofi, Roche, BMS, and Pfizer; research funding (institutional, not personal) from Sanofi. AD: research funding (institutional, not personal) from AstraZeneca. EN: travel and accommodation expenses (institutional, not personal) from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, and Teva. DL: consulting or advisory role (institutional, not personal) for AstraZeneca, Biocartis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Hedera Dx, Montis Biosciences, MSD; consulting or advisory role (personal) for AstraZeneca, Biocartis, Montis Biosciences, and MSD. FA: consulting or advisory role (institutional, not personal) for MiMark. KV: travel and accommodation expenses (institutional, not personal) from PharmaMar. HGD: travel and accommodation expenses (institutional, not personal) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lily and Company, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro, and Teva; research funding (institutional, not personal) from Roche. ST, AB, KB, RB, LL, XBT, PAV, AH, OD, and KKV: declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRIMMO study design. A Study procedures. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram of B the cervical cohort and C the endometrial cohort. AE adverse event, CNS central nervous system, (e)FAS (extended) full analysis set, SBRT stereotactic body radiotherapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antitumor activity to study treatment in the cervical cohort. A Combined waterfall and swimmer plot. Each row (i.e., response bar + characteristics + swimmer lane) corresponds to one patient. Waterfall plot showing best percentage change from baseline in the sum of diameters of the target lesions; best overall response is indicated by color coding of bars and includes assessment of target, nontarget, and new lesions. The dotted lines at − 30% and + 20% indicate thresholds for partial response and progressive disease (PD), respectively, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Swimmer plot (event chart) for tumor response (response category indicated by color coding) and progressive disease per RECIST v1.1, safety, time on study, and death. The solid lines at week 3 and week 26 indicate the first pembrolizumab dose and the timing of the primary endpoint, respectively. B Spider plot. Dynamics of response according to best response (per RECIST v1.1). Circle indicates patients with new lesions or growth in non-target lesions (i.e., PD, even with a less than 20% change in the target lesions). Arrow indicates patients with an ongoing response at time of data cutoff. Square indicates patients with clinical progression (before an imaging scan was acquired). Patients with > 100% increase were truncated at 100% (indicated with a star). C Interval-censored progression-free survival per immune-related response criteria. AE adverse event, BOR best overall response, CR complete response, HPV human papillomavirus, PD progressive disease, PD-L1 programmed death ligand-1, PR partial response, RECIST v1.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, SD stable disease, sTILs stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antitumor activity to study treatment in the cervical cohort. A Combined waterfall and swimmer plot. Each row (i.e., response bar + characteristics + swimmer lane) corresponds to one patient. Waterfall plot showing best percentage change from baseline in the sum of diameters of the target lesions; best overall response is indicated by color coding of bars and includes assessment of target, nontarget, and new lesions. The dotted lines at − 30% and + 20% indicate thresholds for partial response and progressive disease (PD), respectively, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Swimmer plot (event chart) for tumor response (response category indicated by color coding) and progressive disease per RECIST v1.1, safety, time on study, and death. The solid lines at week 3 and week 26 indicate the first pembrolizumab dose and the timing of the primary endpoint, respectively. B Spider plot. Dynamics of response according to best response (per RECIST v1.1). Circle indicates patients with new lesions or growth in non-target lesions (i.e., PD, even with a less than 20% change in the target lesions). Arrow indicates patients with an ongoing response at time of data cutoff. Square indicates patients with clinical progression (before an imaging scan was acquired). Patients with > 100% increase were truncated at 100% (indicated with a star). C Interval-censored progression-free survival per immune-related response criteria. AE adverse event, BOR best overall response, CR complete response, HPV human papillomavirus, PD progressive disease, PD-L1 programmed death ligand-1, PR partial response, RECIST v1.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, SD stable disease, sTILs stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Antitumor activity to study treatment in the endometrial cohort. A Combined waterfall and swimmer plot. B Spider plot. C Interval-censored progression-free survival per immune-related response criteria. AE adverse event, BOR best overall response, CR complete response, MSI microsatellite instability, NOS not otherwise specified, NSMP no specific molecular profile, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog, RECIST v1.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, SD stable disease, sTILs stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Antitumor activity to study treatment in the endometrial cohort. A Combined waterfall and swimmer plot. B Spider plot. C Interval-censored progression-free survival per immune-related response criteria. AE adverse event, BOR best overall response, CR complete response, MSI microsatellite instability, NOS not otherwise specified, NSMP no specific molecular profile, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog, RECIST v1.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, SD stable disease, sTILs stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Local response to stereotactic body radiotherapy by disease cohort. A Cervical cancer cohort. B Endometrial cancer cohort. Bar plot showing the percent change from baseline (at the first imaging scan) in the largest diameter of the irradiated tumor lesion (short axis in case of a nodal lesion); best overall response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) is indicated by color coding of bars and includes assessment of target, nontarget, and new lesions (excluding the irradiated tumor lesion). The dotted line at − 30% indicates the threshold for local response. Each column (i.e., response bar + case ID + location of irradiated tumor lesion) corresponds to one patient. CID case ID, RECIST v1.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Differences in peripheral T cells between responders and nonresponders. Violin plot showing differences between responders (gray) and nonresponders (blue) in the proportion of peripheral A T cells, cytotoxic T cells, and B regulatory T cells, as well as in C the ratio helper to cytotoxic T cells. Patients were grouped according to their week 26 response per immune-related response criteria (irRC). The p values were obtained by the Mann–Whitney U/Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. CR complete response, CTL cytotoxic T lymphocyte, irRC immune-related response criteria, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cell, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, SD stable disease

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McMeekin DS, Filiaci VL, Thigpen JT, Gallion HH, Fleming GF, Rodgers WH (2007) The relationship between histology and outcome in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer patients participating in first-line chemotherapy trials: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 106(1):16–22 - PubMed
    1. Tewari KS, Sill MW, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, Landrum LM et al (2017) Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). Lancet 390(10103):1654–1663 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S et al (2021) ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 31(1):12–39 - PubMed
    1. Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N (2017) Cervical cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 28(suppl_4):72–83 - PubMed
    1. Marabelle A, Le DT, Ascierto PA, Giacomo AMD, Jesus-Acosta AD, Delord J-P et al (2020) Efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with noncolorectal high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol 38(1):1–10 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data