Short-Term Outcomes of Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Nationwide Inpatient Data Study in Japan
- PMID: 35960454
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12346-x
Short-Term Outcomes of Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Nationwide Inpatient Data Study in Japan
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown that epidural analgesia (EDA) is associated with a decreased risk of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, and several guidelines strongly recommend EDA use after esophagectomy. However, the benefit of EDA use in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) remains unclear.
Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the short-term outcomes between patients with and without EDA undergoing MIE for esophageal cancer.
Methods: Data of patients who underwent oncologic MIE (April 2014-March 2019) were extracted from a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), propensity score matching, and instrumental variable analyses were performed to investigate the associations between EDA use and short-term outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders.
Results: Among 12,688 eligible patients, EDA was used in 9954 (78.5%) patients. In-hospital mortality, respiratory complications, and anastomotic leakage occurred in 230 (1.8%), 2139 (16.9%), and 1557 (12.3%) patients, respectively. In stabilized IPTW, EDA use was significantly associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.46 [95% confidence interval 0.34-0.61]), respiratory complications (OR 0.74 [0.66-0.84]), and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.77 [0.67-0.88]). EDA use was also associated with decreased prolonged mechanical ventilation, unplanned intubation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, acetaminophen use, postoperative length of stay, and total hospitalization costs and increased vasopressor use. One-to-three propensity score matching and instrumental variable analyses demonstrated equivalent results.
Conclusions: EDA use in oncologic MIE was associated with low in-hospital mortality as well as decreased respiratory complications, and anastomotic leakage, suggesting the potential advantage of EDA use in MIE.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Comment in
-
ASO Author Reflections: Epidural Analgesia Decreases In-Hospital Mortality, Respiratory Complications, and Anastomotic Leakage After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8235-8236. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12431-1. Epub 2022 Aug 27. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36029380 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of Prophylactic Corticosteroid Use on In-hospital Mortality and Respiratory Failure After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Nationwide Inpatient Data Study in Japan.Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):e1247-e1253. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005502. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Ann Surg. 2023. PMID: 35833418
-
Comparing Perioperative Mortality and Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis.Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):324-330. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003500. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 31356263
-
Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jan 18;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02410-2. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 38238681 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.Surg Today. 2013 Mar;43(3):237-44. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z. Epub 2012 Aug 28. Surg Today. 2013. PMID: 22926551 Review.
-
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Is There an Advantage?Adv Surg. 2016 Sep;50(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Jun 28. Adv Surg. 2016. PMID: 27520859 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
[Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Evidence and Practice].Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Mar 20;56(2):556-562. doi: 10.12182/20250360102. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025. PMID: 40599298 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
-
Essential updates 2022/2023: Recent advances in perioperative management of esophagectomy to improve operative outcomes.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Jul 29;8(6):966-976. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12847. eCollection 2024 Nov. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024. PMID: 39502734 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcome research on esophagectomy analyzed using nationwide databases in Japan: evidences generated from real-world data.Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):411-418. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01080-w. Epub 2024 Aug 19. Esophagus. 2024. PMID: 39158676 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidural analgesia during esophagectomy and esophageal cancer prognosis: A population-based nationwide study in Finland.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70016. doi: 10.1111/aas.70016. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025. PMID: 40066779 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative outcomes of esophagectomy after doublet versus docetaxel-based triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy in older patients: A nationwide inpatient database study in Japan.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Feb 5;9(4):687-697. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70000. eCollection 2025 Jul. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025. PMID: 40607291 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;269:291–8. - PubMed
-
- Kuppusamy MK, Low DE. Evaluation of international contemporary operative outcomes and management trends associated with esophagectomy: a 4-year study of >6000 patients using ECCG definitions and the online Esodata database. Ann Surg. 2022;275(3):515–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004309 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sakamoto T, Fujiogi M, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Comparing perioperative mortality and morbidity of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nationwide retrospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2021;274:324–30. - PubMed
-
- Yoshida N, Yamamoto H, Baba H, et al. Can minimally invasive esophagectomy replace open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer? Latest analysis of 24,233 esophagectomies from the Japanese National Clinical Database. Ann Surg. 2020;272:118–24. - PubMed
-
- Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, Maynard ND. Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg. 2014;259:413–31. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous