COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35960730
- PMCID: PMC9374244
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273112
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Since the successful development of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) vaccine, COVID-19 vaccination has been actively advocated all over the world. As the key population for COVID-19 vaccination, the acceptance of Healthcare Workers (HCWs) is not only related to their risk of contracting COVID-19 infection at work, but also affects the decision of the general population on COVID-19 vaccination. Currently, a series of observational studies have been conducted on the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs in China, but there are presently no all-inclusive reviews. Therefore, this paper reviewed to identify a reliable estimate of acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs in China.
Methods: We conducted a search on PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang Database, CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) and VIP database (Chinese Scientific Journal Database) from January 2020 to June 2022. The quality of included articles was estimated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool suitable for cross-sectional studies and STATA 16 was used for analysis, A random-effects model was used to calculate acceptance rate for COVID-19 vaccine, as well as subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.
Result: This review included 18 studies involving 45,760 subjects, all of which were of medium or high quality. Meta-analysis results represented that, the pooled estimated acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs in China was 78% (95%CI: 73-83%), and the pooled acceptance rate in 2021 (82%, 95%CI: 78-86%) was significantly higher than that in 2020 (73%, 95%CI: 65%-81%). Subgroup analysis showed different acceptance rates for COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs with different characteristics.
Conclusion: The result revealed that HCWs in China generally have a high acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccines, but the acceptance rate varies with different characteristics of the population. Therefore, corresponding training should be carried out for HCWs with different characteristics, and they should play an exemplary and leading role in COVID-19 vaccination, so as to improve the vaccination rate of the whole population and form an immune barrier at an early date.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among health care workers in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2022 May 18;17(5):e0268711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268711. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35584110 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among healthcare workers: A meta-analysis.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;10:881903. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.881903. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36187624 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in Arab Countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0296432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296432. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38166119 Free PMC article.
-
The acceptance to heterologous booster vaccination of COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and targeted population: A cross-sectional study in central China.Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;10:943876. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.943876. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35979461 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of acceptance of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among Lebanese health care workers using health belief model.PLoS One. 2022 Feb 22;17(2):e0264128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264128. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35192664 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and predictors of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among healthcare workers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 28;18(7):e0289295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289295. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37506132 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare workers' willingness to receive COVID-19 booster dose and associated factors in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2357214. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2357214. Epub 2024 May 23. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024. PMID: 38783665 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students, health professionals, and health care workers: an umbrella review.Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2024 Oct;13(4):263-270. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2024.13.4.263. Epub 2024 Oct 31. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2024. PMID: 39525674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intention: a meta-review.Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 12;11:1162861. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1162861. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37377544 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Apr 30;10:e54769. doi: 10.2196/54769. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 38687992 Free PMC article.
References
-
- COVID Live—Coronavirus Statistics—Worldometer. [cited 8 Jun 2022]. Available: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials