Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;72(5):597-606.
doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review

Marek Nahajowski  1 , Joanna Lis  2 , Michał Sarul  3
Affiliations

Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review

Marek Nahajowski et al. Int Dent J. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this review was to determine whether the type of removable appliance, as well as the age and sex of the patient, may affect the extension or reduction of wear time by assessing the correlation between the mean actual and orthodontist-recommended wear times.

Methods: Randomised case control trials, cohort studies, case series, observational studies, reviews, and retrospective analyses were identified. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were reviewed, and 542 articles were obtained, of which 31 were qualified for qualitative synthesis. The data from 1674 participants were collected and a weighted average was determined for the mean wear time of each appliance.

Results: Regardless of the type of extra- or intraoral appliances, mean wear time was shorter than recommended, although patients using intraoral appliances cooperated more. The best compliance was noted for Schwarz appliances (73.70%) and plate retainers (85%). There was no evidence of an influence of patients' age and sex on compliance during treatment.

Conclusions: The considerable inconsistency and imprecision of articles could affect the reliability of the results. Previous studies analysing the effectiveness of treatment with removable appliances based on an arbitrarily assumed average wear time need to be revised in order to verify the actual wear time with the use of microsensors.

Keywords: Compliance; Malocclusion; Microsensors; Orthodontics; Removable appliances.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None disclosed.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bernas AJ, Banting DW, Short LL. Effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in an undergraduate teaching clinic. J Dent Educ. 2007;71(9):1179–1186. - PubMed
    1. Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(4):418–434. - PubMed
    1. Santamaría-Villegas A, Manrique-Hernandez R, Alvarez-Varela E, Restrepo-Serna C. Effect of removable functional appliances on mandibular length in patients with class II with retrognathism: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tausche E, Luck O, Harzer W. Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(3):237–244. - PubMed
    1. Schott TC, Göz G. Die Einstellung junger Patienten zu Tragezeit, Tragezeitverordnung und elektronischer Tragezeitmessung von herausnehmbaren Apparaturen - Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie. J Orofac Orthop. 2010;71(2):108–116.

Publication types