Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 12;9(1):485.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01602-0.

Nine out of ten samples were mistakenly switched by The Orang-utan Genome Consortium

Affiliations

Nine out of ten samples were mistakenly switched by The Orang-utan Genome Consortium

Graham L Banes et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

The Sumatran orang-utan (Pongo abelii) reference genome was first published in 2011, in conjunction with ten re-sequenced genomes from unrelated wild-caught individuals. Together, these published data have been utilized in almost all great ape genomic studies, plus in much broader comparative genomic research. Here, we report that the original sequencing Consortium inadvertently switched nine of the ten samples and/or resulting re-sequenced genomes, erroneously attributing eight of these to the wrong source individuals. Among them is a genome from the recently identified Tapanuli (P. tapanuliensis) species: thus, this genome was sequenced and published a full six years prior to the species' description. Sex was wrongly assigned to five known individuals; the numbers in one sample identifier were swapped; and the identifier for another sample most closely resembles that of a sample from another individual entirely. These errors have been reproduced in countless subsequent manuscripts, with noted implications for studies reliant on data from known individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Genogram depicting relationships between orang-utans sampled by Locke et al. and known relatives assayed in this study. Orang-utans used in the kinship analysis (Table 1) are circled. The species affiliations of uncircled orang-utans reflect those purported by contemporary studbook records.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Ancestry proportions of the Locke et al. orang-utans, as supervised with provenance data from 27 conspecifics sampled across the natural range of the genus,. Sample SAMN000007170 derives from a Tapanuli orang-utan.

References

    1. Locke DP, et al. Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes. Nature. 2011;469:529–533. doi: 10.1038/nature09687. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones, M. L. Studbook of the orang utan, Pongo pygmaeus (Zoological Society of San Diego, 1980).
    1. Prado-Martinez J, et al. Great ape genetic diversity and population history. Nature. 2013;499:471–475. doi: 10.1038/nature12228. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nater A, et al. Morphometric, behavioral, and genomic evidence for a new orangutan species. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:3487–3498.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kronenberg ZN, et al. High-resolution comparative analysis of great ape genomes. Science. 2018;360:eaar6343. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6343. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources