The impact of users' cognitive function on evaluator perceptions of usability
- PMID: 35962003
- PMCID: PMC9374702
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17441-3
The impact of users' cognitive function on evaluator perceptions of usability
Abstract
To explore the association between the user's cognitive function and usability reported by the evaluator. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a community-based sample. Data about participants' age, sex, education, sleep quantity, subjective memory complaints, and cognitive function were collected. A usability session was conducted to evaluate a digital solution called Brain on Track. Independent linear-regression analyses were used to explore univariable and multivariable associations between evaluator-reported usability assessment and the users' cognitive function, age, sex, education, sleep quantity, and subjective memory complaints. A total of 238 participants entered this study, of which 161 (67.6%) were females and the mean age was 42 (SD 12.9) years old. All variables (age, education, sleep quantity, subjective memory complaints and cognitive function) except sex were significantly associated with evaluator-reported usability in the univariable analysis (p < 0.05). Cognitive function, age, education, and subjective memory complaints remained significant in the multivariable model (F = 38.87, p < 0.001) with an adjusted R2 of 0.391. Cognition scores alone showed an adjusted R2 of 0.288. This work suggests that cognitive function impacts evaluator reported usability, alongside other users' characteristics and needs to be considered in the usability evaluation.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users' characteristics.Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jan;133:104026. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104026. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Int J Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 31733603
-
A study of usability principles and interface design for mobile e-books.Ergonomics. 2015;58(8):1253-65. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1013577. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Ergonomics. 2015. PMID: 25680001
-
Usability testing of the first prototype of the Memento system: a technological device to promote an independent living in people with dementia.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1411-1420. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2017029. Epub 2022 Jan 21. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023. PMID: 35061557
-
Mood, cognition and serotonin transporter availability in current and former ecstasy (MDMA) users: the longitudinal perspective.J Psychopharmacol. 2006 Mar;20(2):211-25. doi: 10.1177/0269881106059486. J Psychopharmacol. 2006. PMID: 16510479 Review.
-
Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.J Biomed Inform. 2017 Mar;67:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 11. J Biomed Inform. 2017. PMID: 28088527 Review.
Cited by
-
Incorporating usability evaluation into iterative development of an online platform to support research participation in Parkinson's disease: a mixed methods protocol.BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 19;13(12):e078638. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078638. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38114283 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of a digital solution for cognitive assessment: The Brain on Track®.Digit Health. 2024 Oct 18;10:20552076241287371. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287371. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39430695 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Relationship Between Digital Trail Making Test Performance and IT Task Performance: Empirical Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 14;11:e49992. doi: 10.2196/49992. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 38875007 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. Ergonomics of human system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2019). (2019).
-
- Martins AI, Queirós A, Rocha NP. Validation of a usability assessment instrument according to the evaluators’ perspective about the users’ performance. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2020;19:515–525. doi: 10.1007/s10209-019-00659-w. - DOI
-
- Nunes IL. Ergonomics & usability—Key factors in knowledge society. Enterp. Work Innov. Stud. 2006;2:87–94.
-
- Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. & Beale, R. Human–Computer Interaction (Prentice Hall, 2004).
-
- Martins AI, Queirós A, Silva AG, Rocha NP. Usability evaluation methods: A systematic review. Hum. Factors Softw. Dev. Des. 2015 doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6485-2.ch013. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources