Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 12;12(1):13753.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17441-3.

The impact of users' cognitive function on evaluator perceptions of usability

Affiliations

The impact of users' cognitive function on evaluator perceptions of usability

Ana Isabel Martins et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

To explore the association between the user's cognitive function and usability reported by the evaluator. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a community-based sample. Data about participants' age, sex, education, sleep quantity, subjective memory complaints, and cognitive function were collected. A usability session was conducted to evaluate a digital solution called Brain on Track. Independent linear-regression analyses were used to explore univariable and multivariable associations between evaluator-reported usability assessment and the users' cognitive function, age, sex, education, sleep quantity, and subjective memory complaints. A total of 238 participants entered this study, of which 161 (67.6%) were females and the mean age was 42 (SD 12.9) years old. All variables (age, education, sleep quantity, subjective memory complaints and cognitive function) except sex were significantly associated with evaluator-reported usability in the univariable analysis (p < 0.05). Cognitive function, age, education, and subjective memory complaints remained significant in the multivariable model (F = 38.87, p < 0.001) with an adjusted R2 of 0.391. Cognition scores alone showed an adjusted R2 of 0.288. This work suggests that cognitive function impacts evaluator reported usability, alongside other users' characteristics and needs to be considered in the usability evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. Ergonomics of human system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2019). (2019).
    1. Martins AI, Queirós A, Rocha NP. Validation of a usability assessment instrument according to the evaluators’ perspective about the users’ performance. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2020;19:515–525. doi: 10.1007/s10209-019-00659-w. - DOI
    1. Nunes IL. Ergonomics & usability—Key factors in knowledge society. Enterp. Work Innov. Stud. 2006;2:87–94.
    1. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. & Beale, R. Human–Computer Interaction (Prentice Hall, 2004).
    1. Martins AI, Queirós A, Silva AG, Rocha NP. Usability evaluation methods: A systematic review. Hum. Factors Softw. Dev. Des. 2015 doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6485-2.ch013. - DOI

Publication types