A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
- PMID: 35962384
- PMCID: PMC9375262
- DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01486-8
A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
Abstract
Introduction: With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion.
Methods: From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking abortion at 4 facilities in 3 US states. We explored consideration of self-managed abortion (SMA) using responses to the question: "Would you consider ending this pregnancy on your own if you are unable to obtain care at a health care facility?" We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations between individual sociodemographic, pregnancy and care-seeking characteristics and prevalence of considering SMA. In bivariate Poisson models, we also explored whether consideration of SMA differed by specific obstacles to abortion care.
Results: One-third (34%) of 741 participants indicated they would definitely or probably consider ending the pregnancy on their own if unable to obtain care at a facility. Consideration of SMA was higher among those who reported no health insurance (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.66; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.12-2.44), described the pregnancy as unintended (aPR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.16), were seeking abortion due to concerns about their own physical or mental health (aPR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.02, 2.20), or experienced obstacles that delayed their abortion care seeking (aPR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.49, 3.40). Compared to those who would not consider SMA, participants who would consider SMA expressed higher difficulty finding an abortion facility (35 vs. 27%, p = 0.019), figuring out how to get to the clinic (29 vs 21%, p = 0.021) and needing multiple clinic visits (23 vs 17%, p = 0.044).
Conclusions: One in three people seeking facility-based abortion would consider SMA if unable to obtain abortion care at a facility. As abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the US, SMA may become more common. Future research should continue to monitor people's consideration and use of SMA and ensure that they have access to safe and effective methods.
Keywords: Abortion; Abortion restrictions; Decision-making; Medication abortion; Self-managed abortion.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33947413 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Self-Managed Abortion Among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29245. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33337493 Free PMC article.
-
Motivations and Experiences of People Seeking Medication Abortion Online in the United States.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Dec;50(4):157-163. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12073. Epub 2018 Jul 11. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018. PMID: 29992793 Free PMC article.
-
Self-managed abortion.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):435-440. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000585. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31693568 Review.
-
Medical abortion offered in pharmacy versus clinic-based settings.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 11;6(6):CD013566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013566.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34114643 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The impact of parental involvement laws on minors seeking abortion services: a systematic review.Health Aff Sch. 2023 Sep 18;1(4):qxad045. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad045. eCollection 2023 Oct. Health Aff Sch. 2023. PMID: 38756747 Free PMC article.
-
Judicial bypass for minors post-Dobbs.Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231219601. doi: 10.1177/17455057231219601. Womens Health (Lond). 2023. PMID: 38146197 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Self-Managed Abortion in the United States.Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2023;12(2):70-75. doi: 10.1007/s13669-023-00354-x. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37305376 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imagining Coat-Hangers and Pills: A Qualitative Exploration of Abortion Beliefs and Attitudes in Hostile Policy Contexts in the United States.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):25-35. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12289. Epub 2025 Jan 9. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 39789658 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jerman J, Jones RK, Onda T. Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008. 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014. Accessed 21 Apr 2022.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous