Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;39(10):4757-4771.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02286-z. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

Effects of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations

Effects of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Bomin Kim et al. Adv Ther. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Lazertinib is an irreversible, mutant-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Co-administration of TKIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) can lead to potential drug-drug interactions, which decreases solubility and absorption of TKIs and is ultimately associated with reduced efficacy of TKIs. This retrospective analysis evaluated the effect of ARAs on the pharmacokinetics of lazertinib using data obtained from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods: In a total of 234 patients with lazertinib pharmacokinetics observed at steady state, dose-normalized (DN) area under the concentration-time curve (AUCss), maximum concentration (Cmax,ss), and/or trough concentration on day 15 (CD15) were compared between a group receiving ARA concomitantly for at least 4 days (ARA group) and another group not receiving ARA (non-ARA group) in a dose-proportional range. Additionally, a comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters at a therapeutic dose of 240 mg once daily was evaluated.

Results: Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of ARA group to non-ARA group for DNAUCss, DNCmax,ss, and DNCD15 at 40 mg to 320 mg once daily showing the dose proportionality were 0.8743 (0.7285-1.0493), 0.9035 (0.7482-1.0910), and 0.9126 (0.7364-1.1311), respectively. GMRs with 90% CIs for AUCss, Cmax,ss, and CD15 at 240 mg were 0.9136 (0.6637-1.2576), 0.9012 (0.6703-1.2116), and 0.8850 (0.6463-1.2118), respectively.

Conclusion: All pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (p values > 0.05), indicating that co-administered ARAs did not significantly affect the steady state pharmacokinetics of lazertinib. Therefore, no dose adjustment of lazertinib is required in patients receiving concomitant ARAs.

Gov identifiers: NCT03046992, NCT04075396.

Keywords: Acid-reducing agent; Drug–drug interactions; Lazertinib; Pharmacokinetics; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dose proportionality of lazertinib in the dose range of 40 to 320 mg. The circles represent the observed values, the black straight line represents the linear regression line, and the red and blue dashed lines represent the 90% confidence limits and 90% prediction limits, respectively: a ln(AUCss) versus ln(dose); b ln(Cmax,ss) versus ln(dose); c ln(CD15) versus ln(dose)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of the dose-normalized pharmacokinetic parameters of lazertinib between the ARA and non-ARA groups in the dose range of 40 to 320 mg. The dashed and solid lines across each box represent the median and arithmetic mean of the dose-normalized pharmacokinetic parameters, respectively. The upper and lower whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values within 1.5-fold interquartile range: a dose-normalized AUCss; b dose-normalized Cmax,ss; c dose-normalized CD15
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters of lazertinib between the ARA and non-ARA groups at 240 mg. The dashed and solid lines across each box represent the median and arithmetic mean of the pharmacokinetic parameters, respectively. The upper and lower whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values within 1.5-fold interquartile range: a AUCss; b Cmax,ss; c CD15
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Geometric mean ratios of ARA group to non-ARA group with 90% confidence intervals of pharmacokinetic parameters of lazertinib: empty circle, square, and triangle represent the geometric mean ratio of the dose-normalized AUCss, Cmax,ss, and CD15 of ARA group to non-ARA group, respectively, in the dose range of 40 to 320 mg. Filled circle, square, and triangle represent the geometric mean ratio of the dose-normalized AUCss, Cmax,ss, and CD15 of ARA group to non-ARA group, respectively, at 240 mg. The line extending from the point represents the 90% confidence interval for each geometric mean ratio

References

    1. Hong MH, Lee IY, Koh JS, et al. P3.02b–119 YH25448, a highly selective 3rd generation EGFR TKI, exhibits superior survival over osimertinib in animal model with brain metastases from NSCLC: Topic: EGFR RES. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):S1265–S1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.1787. - DOI
    1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety Republic of Korea, LECLAZA (lazertinib): prescribing information. 2022.
    1. Westover D, Zugazagoitia J, Cho BC, Lovly CM, Paz-Ares L. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2018;1(29):i10–i19. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx703. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao J, Li HR, Jin C, Jiang JH, Ding JY. Strategies to overcome acquired resistance to EGFR TKI in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21(10):1287–1301. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02075-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karachaliou N, Fernandez-Bruno M, Paulina Bracht JW, Rosell R. EGFR first- and second-generation TKIs—there is still place for them in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Transl Cancer Res. 2018;2:S23–S47. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2018.10.06. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data