Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Sep;21(9):792-802.
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00218-6.

Incremental prognostic value of acute serum biomarkers for functional outcome after traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI): an observational cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Incremental prognostic value of acute serum biomarkers for functional outcome after traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI): an observational cohort study

Isabel R A Retel Helmrich et al. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Several studies have reported an association between serum biomarker values and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury. We aimed to examine the incremental (added) prognostic value of serum biomarkers over demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics and over established prognostic models, such as IMPACT and CRASH, for prediction of functional outcome.

Methods: We used data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) core study. We included patients aged 14 years or older who had blood sampling within 24 h of injury, results from a CT scan, and outcome assessment according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) at 6 months. Amounts in serum of six biomarkers (S100 calcium-binding protein B, neuron-specific enolase, glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 [UCH-L1], neurofilament protein-light, and total tau) were measured. The incremental prognostic value of these biomarkers was determined separately and in combination. The primary outcome was the GOSE 6 months after injury. Incremental prognostic value, using proportional odds and a dichotomised analysis, was assessed by delta C-statistic and delta R2 between models with and without serum biomarkers, corrected for optimism with a bootstrapping procedure.

Findings: Serum biomarker values and 6-month GOSE were available for 2283 of 4509 patients. Higher biomarker levels were associated with worse outcome. Adding biomarkers improved the C-statistic by 0·014 (95% CI 0·009-0·020) and R2 by 4·9% (3·6-6·5) for predicting GOSE compared with demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics. UCH-L1 had the greatest incremental prognostic value. Adding biomarkers to established prognostic models resulted in a relative increase in R2 of 48-65% for IMPACT and 30-34% for CRASH prognostic models.

Interpretation: Serum biomarkers have incremental prognostic value for functional outcome after traumatic brain injury. Our findings support integration of biomarkers-particularly UCH-L1-in established prognostic models.

Funding: European Union's Seventh Framework Programme, Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, OneMind, Integra LifeSciences, and NeuroTrauma Sciences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests All authors were supported by grants from the EU, Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, OneMind, Integra LifeSciences, and NeuroTrauma Sciences during the conduct of the study. DKM reports grants and personal fees from Lantmannen AB, Neurotrauma Sciences, Pressura Neuro, Calico, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Cortirio, ABCDx, Integra Neurosciences, Gryphon, and Pinteon, outside of the submitted work. AIRM declares personal fees from Abbott Laboratories and Novartis and participated on an advisory board from PresSura Neuro during the conduct of the study. EWS reports royalties for a textbook on clinical prediction models from Springer during the conduct of the study. KKWW reports being shareholder of Gryphon Bio during the conduct of the study. LW reports personal fees from Vasopharm, Roche Pharma, and Novartis during the conduct of the study.

Comment in

Publication types