Intake, performance, and feeding behavior of Holstein and Holstein × Gyr heifers grazing intensively managed tropical grasses during the rainy season
- PMID: 35964480
- DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100613
Intake, performance, and feeding behavior of Holstein and Holstein × Gyr heifers grazing intensively managed tropical grasses during the rainy season
Abstract
Holstein × Gyr and Holstein are the primary dairy breeds used in tropical systems, but when rearing under pasture, feed intake, behavior, and performance might differ between them. This study aimed to evaluate the voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, performance, and ingestive behavior of Holstein and Holstein × Gyr (½ Holstein × ½ Gyr) heifers managed in a rotational system of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq. cv. Mombaça). The experiment was conducted during the summer season throughout four periods of 21 d. Two 8-heifers (four Holstein and four Holstein × Gyr) groups, averaging 258.6 ± 24.79 kg and 157.1 ± 24.99 kg BW, were used. Each group grazed a separate set of 16 paddocks, and all heifers received a concentrate supplement daily. Heifers were weighed at the beginning and end of the experiment. Fecal, forage and concentrate samples were evaluated for their DM, CP, crude fat, ash, NDF, and indigestible NDF. Feeding behavior was evaluated through 24 h of live observation for 48 h of each experimental period. Grazing, ruminating, resting, and intake of concentrate times were recorded, and rumination criteria, bout criteria, mealtime, meal frequency, and meal duration were calculated. There was no difference in total dry matter intake (DMI), but forage DMI of Holstein × Gyr was 11.70 % greater than the Holstein heifers. The Holstein × Gyr heifers had greater NDF intake and feed efficiency tended to show greater CP and NDF digestibilities, consequently, they had greater average daily gain (ADG). Holstein grazed less than Holstein × Gyr heifers in the afternoon. Ruminating time was 18.43 % lower for Holstein than Holstein × Gyr heifers, and rumination criteria (i.e. longest non-feeding interval within a rumination event) were greater for Holstein heifers. Holstein heifers presented more prolonged rumination bouts and resting time than Holstein × Gyr heifers. Holstein × Gyr can ingest and ruminate greater amounts of fibrous material, and Holstein heifers needed to spend more time ruminating the cud. Overall, even though the behavior was not markedly different between breeds, rearing young Holstein heifers in tropical pasture conditions is less suitable than Holstein-Gyr because of their lower ADG. Therefore, this management condition seems appropriate for Holstein × Gyr but inappropriate for Holstein dairy heifers.
Keywords: Bout criteria; Dairy; Intake; Replacement; Ruminating.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Supplementation strategies affect the feed intake and performance of grazing replacement heifers.PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0221651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221651. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31525216 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of co-grazing dairy heifers with goats on animal performance, dry matter yield, and pasture forage composition.J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4467-77. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4643. Epub 2012 Sep 5. J Anim Sci. 2012. PMID: 22952353
-
Performance and feeding behavior of Holstein and Holstein × Gyr crossbred heifers grazing temperate forages.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Feb 10;54(2):100. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03106-w. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022. PMID: 35142920
-
Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual feed intake classification.Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1648-61. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000559. Animal. 2012. PMID: 23031564
-
Effects of dietary supplementation on ingestive behavior and consumption of grazing sheep: a systematic review.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 Feb 26;57(2):81. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04337-3. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025. PMID: 40009085
Cited by
-
Comparison of ruminal microbiota, IL-1β gene variation, and tick incidence between Holstein × Gyr and Holstein heifers in grazing system.Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1132151. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1132151. eCollection 2024. Front Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38468851 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating net energy for activity for grazing beef cattle by integrating GPS tracking data, in-pasture weighing technology, and animal nutrition models.Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 23;12:1620584. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1620584. eCollection 2025. Front Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 40771946 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous