The Influence of Surgeon Caseload and Usage on the Long-Term Outcomes of Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man
- PMID: 35964854
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.011
The Influence of Surgeon Caseload and Usage on the Long-Term Outcomes of Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man
Abstract
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision rates are variable and known to be influenced by a surgeon's caseload (number of UKAs performed annually) and usage (UKA as a proportion of overall knee arthroplasty practice). It is not known which is more important. We explored the influence of caseload and usage on cemented and cementless UKA.
Methods: A total of 34,277 medial Oxford UKAs (23,707 cemented and 10,570 cementless) from the National Joint Registry were analyzed. UKAs were subdivided by the following: (1) surgeon caseload, into low (<10 UKAs/y) and high (≥10 UKAs/y) categories; and (2) usage, into low (<20%) and high (≥20%) categories. The 10-year revision rates were compared.
Results: The 10-year survival of the low-caseload/low-usage cemented and cementless UKA was 82.8% (CI 81.6-83.9) and 86.2% (CI 72.1-93.4), respectively. The 10-year survival of the high-caseload/high-usage cemented and cementless UKA was 90.0% (CI 89.2-90.6) and 93.3% (CI 91.3-94.8), respectively. For cemented UKA, the high-caseload/high-usage group had lower revision rates (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57, CI 0.52-0.63, P < .001) compared to the low-caseload/low-usage group. The high-caseload/low-usage (HR 0.74, CI 0.66-0.83, P < .001) and the low-caseload/high-usage (HR 0.86, CI 0.74-0.99, P = .04) groups also had lower revision rates than the low-caseload/low-usage group.
Conclusion: Mobile-bearing UKA revision rates improve with both increasing surgeon UKA caseload and usage. Surgeons using cemented UKA who have usage ≥20% and caseload ≥10/year had a 10-year survival of 90%. Higher survivorship was associated with higher caseload, higher usage, and cementless fixation.
Levels of evidence: III.
Keywords: caseload; fixation; revision; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; usage.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Effect of Surgeon Caseload on the Relative Revision Rate of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 15;102(8):644-653. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01060. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020. PMID: 32004190
-
A Matched Comparison of Implant and Functional Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: A Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man and the Hospital Episode Statistics Patient Reported Outcome Measures Database.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Sep 4;106(17):1553-1562. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01418. Epub 2024 Jul 9. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024. PMID: 38980924
-
A Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Cemented and Cementless Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8):2007-2013. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Feb 12. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 38355062
-
The Interaction of Caseload and Usage in Determining Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3228-3237.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.063. Epub 2017 May 11. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28641970 Review.
-
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39294529
Cited by
-
Long-term outcome of periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-centre case series.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 3;12(2):e70230. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70230. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40182610 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective Analysis of Factors Influencing Clinical Outcomes of Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Infection After Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty.Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Jun 12;18:2977-2986. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S517567. eCollection 2025. Infect Drug Resist. 2025. PMID: 40529234 Free PMC article.
-
Measured Resection as Gap Balance Method in Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(2):603-613. doi: 10.1111/os.14346. Epub 2025 Jan 5. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 39757775 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Learning from the past-A substantial number of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions are potentially avoidable: A radiographic analysis of 98 cases.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 1;12(2):e70205. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70205. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40170706 Free PMC article.
-
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an exemplar of surgical and engineering collaboration.Bone Jt Open. 2024 Dec 20;5(12):1120-1122. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0196. Bone Jt Open. 2024. PMID: 39701129 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials