Task shifting cesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35965383
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14401
Task shifting cesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Safe and timely access to cesarean section (CS) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) remains a significant challenge.
Objectives: To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes of CS by non-physician clinicians (NPCs) versus physicians in LMIC.
Search strategy and selection criteria: A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), Web of Science, and LILACS was performed from inception to January 2022.
Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and meta-analysis was performed when possible.
Main results: Ten studies from seven African countries were included. There was no significant difference in maternal mortality for CS performed by NPCs versus physicians (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-2.14, P = 0.8, I2 = 70%, P < 0.05, eight studies, n = 20 711) or in perinatal mortality (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.86-1.61, P = 0.3, I2 = 88%, n = 19 716). Despite heterogeneous clinical settings between providers, there was no difference in the rates of wound infection or re-operation, although there was a higher rate of wound complications (such as dehiscence) in the NPC group (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.21-2.95, P = 0.005, n = 6507).
Conclusions: NPCs have comparable maternal and neonatal outcomes for CS compared with standard providers, albeit with increased odds of wound complication.
Prospero registration: CRD42020217966.
Keywords: cesarean section; low-income country; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality; middle-income country; non-physician clinician; perinatal mortality; postoperative complication; task-shifting.
© 2022 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Callister LC, Edwards JE. Sustainable development goals and the ongoing process of reducing maternal mortality. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(3):e56-e64.
-
- Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN maternal mortality estimation inter-agency group. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462-474.
-
- Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Cesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa. Matern Health, Neonatol Perinatol. 2016;2(1):6.
-
- Irani M, Deering S. Challenges affecting access to cesarean delivery and strategies to overcome them in low-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):30-34.
-
- Thomas S, Meadows J, McQueen KAK. Access to cesarean section will reduce maternal mortality in low-income countries: a mathematical model. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1537-1541.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
