Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 28:16:796100.
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.796100. eCollection 2022.

An Expanded Framework for Situation Control

Affiliations
Review

An Expanded Framework for Situation Control

James Llinas et al. Front Syst Neurosci. .

Abstract

There is an extensive body of literature on the topic of estimating situational states, in applications ranging from cyber-defense to military operations to traffic situations and autonomous cars. In the military/defense/intelligence literature, situation assessment seems to be the sine qua non for any research on surveillance and reconnaissance, command and control, and intelligence analysis. Virtually all of this work focuses on assessing the situation-at-the-moment; many if not most of the estimation techniques are based on Data and Information Fusion (DIF) approaches, with some recent schemes employing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) methods. But estimating and recognizing situational conditions is most often couched in a decision-making, action-taking context, implying that actions may be needed so that certain goal situations will be reached as a result of such actions, or at least that progress toward such goal states will be made. This context thus frames the estimation of situational states in the larger context of a control-loop, with a need to understand the temporal evolution of situational states, not just a snapshot at a given time. Estimating situational dynamics requires the important functions of situation recognition, situation prediction, and situation understanding that are also central to such an integrated estimation + action-taking architecture. The varied processes for all of these combined capabilities lie in a closed-loop "situation control" framework, where the core operations of a stochastic control process involve situation recognition-learning-prediction-situation "error" assessment-and action taking to move the situation to a goal state. We propose several additional functionalities for this closed-loop control process in relation to some prior work on this topic, to include remarks on the integration of control-theoretic principles. Expanded remarks are also made on the state of the art of the schemas and computational technologies for situation recognition, prediction and understanding, as well as the roles for human intelligence in this larger framework.

Keywords: estimation; prediction; situation assessment; situation control; stochastic control and time-varying systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Concept of cognitive situational control derived from Jakobson (2017).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Expanded framework of cognitive situation control.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Distinctions in prediction-anticipation-prospection derived from Bubic et al. (2010).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Factors influencing the nature of prediction derived from Bubic et al. (2010).

References

    1. Almeida J. P. A., Costa P. D., Guizzardi G., João P. A. (2018). “Towards an ontology of scenes and situations,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA). (Boston, MA: ), 29–35. 10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423994 - DOI
    1. Austerweil J. L., Sanborn S., Griffiths T. L. (2019). Learning how to generalize. Cogn. Sci. 43:e12777. 10.1111/cogs.12777 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azarewicz J., Fala G., Heithecker C. (1989). “Template-based multi-agent plan recognition for tactical situation assessment,” in In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications. (Miami, FL: IEEE; ).
    1. Baumgartner N., Gottesheim W., Retschitzegger W., Mitsch S., Schwinger W. (2010). “Situation prediction nets – playing the token game for ontology-driven situation awareness,” in Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. (Vancouver, BC: Springer; ). 10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_15 - DOI
    1. Baumgartner N., Retschitzegger W. (2006). “A survey of upper ontologies for situation awareness,” in Proc. of the 4th Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Sharing and Collaborative Engineering. (Calgary,AB: ACTA Press; ), 1–9.

LinkOut - more resources